Replies

I have a lot of respect for your posting, but this idea that they are both "the same" is quite honestly a total load of crap.

You can't really believe that these two have "the same masters"......heck, at least get your conspiracy theories straight, the mormon tyrants are not on the same page as the Marxists.....:-)

Kidding aside, they are hugely different. Pretending they are both "socialists", therefore the same, is simply not the truth. Mitt is far from a conservative, but he ain't into destroying this country with a pro-Marxist, anti-American group of cadres that want to punish America for its so called sins.

I'm sorry, you really need to rethink this one. Palin, Newt, Cain, Santorum, every one of the candidates you once supported (some you have supported with great enthusiasm) have come to a very different conclusion than you have.

Mitt may be a RINO squish that will disappoint conservatives, but he's not in the same league as Bambi. Not even close.

When did Palin endorse Romney or did she give a vague statement like “I’ll support who wins” or “in a brokered convention, I will step up”.
Every time I see Palin mention Romney, she shivers like she can’t hardly get his name out, Romney did what he could to destroy her why would she be a big supporter now?

...this idea that they are both "the same" is quite honestly a total load of crap.

Obviously they're not precisely the same. No two things in all the universe are, but Mitt and Obama's records fit like hand and glove on all of the big things:

Anti-gun - check
Pro-abort - check
Pro-gay 'marriage' - check
Economic malaise on watch - check
High unemployment on watch - check
Lib judge appointing - check
Government mandated health care - check
Anti-Reaganite - check
Tax raising - check
Pro-Global Warming agenda - check
Pro-Amnesty for illegals - check

Kidding aside, they are hugely different.

Yeah??? Where? At the end of the day, their agendas, and the effects they've created, are the same on everything that counts.

This rebuttal that 'Romney's not a Marxist, bent on destroying the US!' only goes so far. So what, if he doesn't have a personal history of association with Commies and Marxists? He's done the same things in office that every good little Commie wanna-be has, so what the hell is the real difference? There IS no substantial difference!

Screw the labels. They don't matter. Only effects do.

I don't vote for politicians who create those kinds of effects.