Replies

Only on FR do I see the twin delusions: I'm not seeing what you are.

1) the R convention may nominate somebody else beside Mitty

I don't see anyone thinking this is actually going to happen. I do see people saying it's the only reasoned thing to do when a guy this Left gets the nomination. I heartily agree with that.

2) electing Baraq will lead to great conservative wins in 014 and 016.

I haven't see anyone advocating for this either. I do see people who reveal that Romney is so far left they can't vote for him in good concience. I am one of them. If Romney were the nominee for the Democrats this year, not a single one of us would vote for him, because he is such a Leftist/Statist.

You may have seen a few people express what you have written here, but I think almost all folks are as I have described their outlook here.

Would I rather see Romney elected rather than Obama? Yes I would, and I think it will happen. I'll still have no part in it.

Whatever this guy passes in the next four years, my hands are clean. And if per chance Obama is re-elected, a lot of us out here said it would be a lot harder to elect another Leftist instead of Obama. What we needed was a man who could clearly differentiate himself from the types of things Obama does.

Obamacare bad! Romneycare good?????? LOL, good luck with that. Repeal and replace... good luck with that too. Don't blame me when he does it.

We need the government out of our lives, not in it with the right plan. There is no right plan. Romney hasn't a clue what I'm talking about here.

Your comments are well reasoned and I welcome your time spent in laying them out.

Early in the year I posted many times that a Romney nomination would lead to a Tea Party candidate on the ballot in most “red” states. Which would lead to Obama winning with a Clintonian plurality as the “anti” vote was divided.

Any insight on why that didn’t happen? There are a couple of 1% fringe candidates but no real movement.