[DoughtyOne]

Okay, that may be true. I’m not trying to imply anything other than I’m taking your word for it.

Let me run this by you though.

1. Homeowner gets city complaint about prayer meetings in home
2. Homeowner requests permit to build on property in response
3. Homeowner states new structure is only a game room
4. City buys off on it

My question is this. Why would the city buy off on the game room plan in the first place? They know he’s under pressure to conform to city codes regarding meetings? The same city department that is explaining to him what his code violations are, simply misses the connection between existing complaints and the inadequate plans for a new structure?

This leaves me scratching my head.

[annieokie]

"""Homeowner states new structure is only a game room"""

Wondering where is the lie in this. Game Room/fellowship hall, same/same. For the most part it is probably used by his family as a game room throughout the week, as it should, being that he owns it.

I see no problem in his wording it as a game room.