Skip to comments.
U.N. Agreement Should Have All Gun Owners Up In Arms
Forbes ^
| 6/07/2011
Posted on 07/09/2012 3:25:03 PM PDT by South40
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
1
posted on
07/09/2012 3:25:05 PM PDT
by
South40
To: South40
"with help from some powerful
anti-American friends."
fixed it
2
posted on
07/09/2012 3:32:42 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: South40
If they want them, they’ll get the ammunition first. No law or treaty surpasses the Bill of Rights. I don’t need the SCOTUS to rule on that; I just need accurate windage. I’m old enough so dying fighting wouldn’t have that much of a negative impact on me.
3
posted on
07/09/2012 3:33:22 PM PDT
by
muir_redwoods
(Legalize Freedom!!)
To: muir_redwoods
“Come and get me, Copper!”
4
posted on
07/09/2012 3:36:19 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: muir_redwoods
Obama and Hillary are just about orgasmic over this.
Theyare too stupid to real;ize that Americans are not going to give up their guns for the UN.
First the Senate has to approve it.
I don’t see that happening , and if it does I see the SHTF.
5
posted on
07/09/2012 3:36:36 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: muir_redwoods
Ditto. I will not surrender my firearms without a fight.
To: South40
Under the guise of a proposed global Small Arms Treaty premised to fight terrorism, insurgency and international crime syndicates...Insurgency is the big one here. The goal is to thwart the resistance to oppressive governments, and those which intend to become such. Clearing the way for progressivism to make drones of most, for the benefit of a few.
Should things go in an ugly direction, most of us will be the insurgents, the resistance; some with weapons and others by means of sabotage and disinformation.
7
posted on
07/09/2012 3:38:57 PM PDT
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
To: South40
Treason in this country is quickly reaching critical mass.
8
posted on
07/09/2012 3:39:28 PM PDT
by
samtheman
(The Trillion Dollar ObamaCareTax definitely is a tax; just ask the US Supreme Court.)
To: South40
If one of those blue helmet shows at my door, make sure a body bag comes with him.
To: Venturer
First the Senate has to approve it.The senate is loaded with RATs and RINOs...
10
posted on
07/09/2012 3:40:49 PM PDT
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
To: South40
Everyone who thinks nobama and the Hildabeaste can get 67 Senators to vote for this, raise your hand. Uh-huh.
11
posted on
07/09/2012 3:45:27 PM PDT
by
upchuck
(FACEBOOK... Share pointless stuff with friends you don't know. Beg for intrusion into your life.)
To: South40
12
posted on
07/09/2012 3:45:27 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: muir_redwoods
Can you still see the front sight friend?
To: South40
MOLON LAVE
14
posted on
07/09/2012 3:47:54 PM PDT
by
Mat_Helm
To: South40
15
posted on
07/09/2012 3:47:54 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: South40
“....the United Nations doesnt approve of our Second Amendment.”
.
It only shows how LOW we have sunk as a nation, that we let a beggar organization like the UN tell us what to do in our own home.
Without our tax dollars, the UN would not exist.
16
posted on
07/09/2012 3:49:14 PM PDT
by
353FMG
To: Venturer; South40; All
17
posted on
07/09/2012 3:49:56 PM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
There are a number of FReepers that mistakenly believe treaties are handled with care and all Senators know to vote on them. The Constitution requires only a majority of “those present” to ratify a treaty, and as you point out, many treaties are ratified underhandedly.
18
posted on
07/09/2012 3:53:00 PM PDT
by
CodeToad
(uired to vote for a treaty.)
To: upchuck
“can get 67 Senators to vote for this”
Where do you get that 67 Senators must vote to ratify a treaty?
19
posted on
07/09/2012 3:54:25 PM PDT
by
CodeToad
(uired to vote for a treaty.)
To: Venturer
>Theyare too stupid to real;ize that Americans are not going to give up their guns for the UN.<
.
You have it all wrong — they WANT you to rise in rebellion and so start a civil war so that they can invite blue-helmeted troops in.
20
posted on
07/09/2012 3:54:25 PM PDT
by
353FMG
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson