Until you can post proof that what you say about martin assaulting zimmerman then you are engaged in nothing but speculation. Got any? No, you don't.
Just admit it...man up and say, "No, I don't have proof that what I say is true." ---- I bet you are not honest enough to do it.
No proof that martin attacked zimmerman ---- that's why you spend hours digging around looking for anything inconsistant that can be tied to the martin family.
The sad thing for you is that absolutely nothing that they or anyone else on the planet ever says or does will ever have anything to do with what happened...they were not there.
You are as sorry as sharpton and the clowns on the other side.
This will do for now: "and zimmerman got his ass kicked".#27
I don't have proof
You do realize that, according to the law, the burden of proof is on you and the state prosecutor not on Zimmerman's side. They know it but you apparently don't.
And yet Zimmerman's side is backed up by statements made under oath, lie detector tests, witness statements given under oath, all the photos at the scene, all the forensic evidence, the autopsy, medical reports, the better judgment of the SPD, and BDLR's admission in his cross-examination of Mr. Zimmerman.
The state prosecutor has DeeDee and clueless people like you.