Posted on 07/08/2012 6:23:39 PM PDT by Brown Deer
You got it...and anyone who doesn’t see the resemblance simply doesn’t want to. Try a comparison of the daughters, that will really come as a revelation
The record the Search pulled up relates to TWO individuals, one with an address at the house in Chicago, the other who claims Equatorial Guinea nationality.
Something about them both combined produces the result.
The name or the birthday or both?
I suggest you study this thread and then the life and timelines of the man he resembles.
Or both purported parents are fictions; IMHO nothing in “Dreams” or the official “Life” of BHO should be accepted unless there is independent verification. There is no actual independent verification that SAD is the mother.
Thanks. It's about the only time we conservatives can play the race card and get away with it ;-)
(actually, I got an automatic letter of denial from the race card provider :-)
I have. The eldest daughter has a touch of lightness to her hair color. That's common amongst the grandchildren of people with light hair (Malcolm's was red).
FATHER AND SON
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2278969/posts
you may find the information posted on this thread of interest
Month then day style of writing the date yields 1/8 1961
-but-
Day then month style of writing the date gives us 8/1 1961
Which style date is on the document?
I thought I read accounts some years ago of her showing up pregnant on the mainland in '61? I know those accounts could just be hearsay, dubbed in by some supportive Obama minion after he was elected.
I also seem to recall seeing some official travel document of Stanley Ann's that listed Barack as 'child'.
But yes, prenatal doctor's records, or hospital admittance records certainly would help to verify Barry's story. Perhaps a baby picture or two from his infant homecoming. Anything, except his own account.
I know, Fred. See my posts to Windflier upthread. =o)
Post 152
and
Post 171.
Look at the document, you can see what I see.
A private investigator who subscribes to a service, enters the name you see on the document, followed by the State in the US where the individual being searched has an address.
The wheels go round and round (LOL!) searching, searching, and out comes the result. It’s by no means totally accurate, what you get is what ‘meshes’ DURING THE SEARCH.
There are obviously TWO individuals who produce this result. One claims Equatorial Guinea nationality, the other lives at a certain address in IL.
But they SHARE something, or else they would BOTH never have appeared on the result together.
And you ask ME what system was used to write the birthdate?
I’m asking; WHAT WAS IT THAT THEY HAD IN COMMON.
Was it the birthdate or the name, or both?
IF a man claiming Equatorial Guinea origin entered the US with the SAME NAME as zero, for example, and HIS birthdate on HIS passport was shown as 8/01/1961, being from a country administered by a prior European colonial power, the date would signify JANUARY 8, 1961.
The kenyan student was in need of an extension to continue his studies, he said on arrival when he was interviewed that he only had enough money for one semester, and needed to find work.
The woman he maintained he was married to in Hawaii he later told immigration he was separated from and she was living in the Philippines. So there's a period during which having a US citizen wife in Hawaii meant he had a better chance of staying in the US.
And Frank Marshall Davis was perfectly set up through his friendship with Stanley Armour Dunham to arrange a fictitious marriage. SAD didn't even have to BE there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.