Look at the document, you can see what I see.
A private investigator who subscribes to a service, enters the name you see on the document, followed by the State in the US where the individual being searched has an address.
The wheels go round and round (LOL!) searching, searching, and out comes the result. It’s by no means totally accurate, what you get is what ‘meshes’ DURING THE SEARCH.
There are obviously TWO individuals who produce this result. One claims Equatorial Guinea nationality, the other lives at a certain address in IL.
But they SHARE something, or else they would BOTH never have appeared on the result together.
And you ask ME what system was used to write the birthdate?
I’m asking; WHAT WAS IT THAT THEY HAD IN COMMON.
Was it the birthdate or the name, or both?
IF a man claiming Equatorial Guinea origin entered the US with the SAME NAME as zero, for example, and HIS birthdate on HIS passport was shown as 8/01/1961, being from a country administered by a prior European colonial power, the date would signify JANUARY 8, 1961.
The date at the top of the form is this format:
Month Day Year
Using the same format for the birth date in the form, we get
August 1, 1961