Jim, again you post something to me that really makes no sense and relies on personal attacks rather than facts and reason.
Romney is running on the platform that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided and that he will appoint the kind of originalist justices who will agree with him on this.
Obama’s stated position on Roe v. Wade is precisely the opposite of Romney’s, and Obama’s record of federal judicial appointments shows that he means exactly what he says.
It is a plain fact that Romney’s stated policy on Roe v. Wade differs from Obama’s. No amount of nonsense posted by you or anyone else changes that one whit.
So the issue then becomes, how much will a Pres. Romney follow through on his currently-stated anti-Roe position? You and the other anti-Romneys say “not at all”.
Well, fine. That is your estimation and obviously you are entitled to it.
As I have said before, I expect Romney to follow through on his anti-Roe position to some degree greater than not at all. Thus I expect a Romney Presidency to be more pro-life than an Obama second term.
Believing this does not make me a “True Blue my party right or wrong any big tent RINO/Statist will do Republican” or any other silly, nonsensical labels.
What it makes me is a pro-life conservative who happens to think that Obama’s defeat would be better for the pro-life cause than would his re-election.
Salve
I have one question, only one and it is yes or no answer. None of (maybe, well, sure, should be, could be, nonetheless, furthermore, in coherence of, therefore and more)
If woman gets pregnant of her lust with man who she needs to enjoy her moment of pleasure, and decides to murder a child, and politicians, system, laws, majority of woman screaming is my body (while they decide faith of other body inside her), groups, doctors, nurses, media and more – is this not a murder of first degree?
Before I will continue this conversation I would like answer Yes or No?
Merci.
Yeah, he’s running on a platform, but it’s all a lie. Look at his fricken abortionist/homosexualist record!! You can’t just sweep that crap away!! Sheesh!!
Well, maybe those with big blue blinders can.
Romney is worse than the openly pro-gay marriage/pro-abortion “conservative” PM David Cameron over here.
Cameron’s positions are out of lock-step with some of his party but are based on clearly articulated although obviously misguided principles. Someone like that can be morally reasoned with.
Romney has never had a position, platform or principle he wasn’t willing to abandon or contradict the moment he thought it politically expedient to do so.
Somewhere there is GOP-E power broker grinning to himself while thinking “Yeah, those right wing nuts might say they’re against Romney, but they’ll vote for him in the end, just like they did McCain and others, because they’ll talk themselves into believing apocalyptic nonsense like ‘there won’t be elections in 4 years’ or some such.”
If you prove them right once again there will be no end to RINO’ism. There only way to bring these people to heel is a demonstration that unless they uphold fundamental conservative principles they can expect no support from conservatives.
When elections are won and lost by 5-8% margins, those who turn out reliably should be calling the shots, not getting played like fiddles by elitist power brokers.