Wouldn’t be so hard to understand if you were truly a pro-life, pro-family, pro-constitutionally limited government conservative FIRST rather than a True Blue my party right or wrong any big tent RINO/Statist will do Republican.
Jim, again you post something to me that really makes no sense and relies on personal attacks rather than facts and reason.
Romney is running on the platform that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided and that he will appoint the kind of originalist justices who will agree with him on this.
Obama’s stated position on Roe v. Wade is precisely the opposite of Romney’s, and Obama’s record of federal judicial appointments shows that he means exactly what he says.
It is a plain fact that Romney’s stated policy on Roe v. Wade differs from Obama’s. No amount of nonsense posted by you or anyone else changes that one whit.
So the issue then becomes, how much will a Pres. Romney follow through on his currently-stated anti-Roe position? You and the other anti-Romneys say “not at all”.
Well, fine. That is your estimation and obviously you are entitled to it.
As I have said before, I expect Romney to follow through on his anti-Roe position to some degree greater than not at all. Thus I expect a Romney Presidency to be more pro-life than an Obama second term.
Believing this does not make me a “True Blue my party right or wrong any big tent RINO/Statist will do Republican” or any other silly, nonsensical labels.
What it makes me is a pro-life conservative who happens to think that Obama’s defeat would be better for the pro-life cause than would his re-election.