Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The entire title is: Time Stuffs Magazine With 15 Pages of Pro-Roberts Coverage; Holder Contempt Vote Gets Two Paragraphs
1 posted on 07/07/2012 4:13:51 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Chris Matthews is going to get this copy for the centerfold.


2 posted on 07/07/2012 4:16:17 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Time magazine should save their blue dress.


3 posted on 07/07/2012 4:17:57 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
“Roberts Rules,” touting his “landmark decision.” Inside, the magazine gave the ruling 15-plus pages of coverage.

Exactly why Roberts did what he did - media adoration.

He's receiving his reward from men alright, but he's sacrificed his soul ( and this country) to get it.

5 posted on 07/07/2012 4:35:35 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

What were on the other 4 pages?


6 posted on 07/07/2012 4:37:00 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

So, mathematically, 1 page of favorable press coverage = 2 pieces of silver?


8 posted on 07/07/2012 4:45:50 PM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Kind of like giving the kid in the corner with the dunce cap a gold star.

As long as he is OUR stupid I suppose.


9 posted on 07/07/2012 4:50:57 PM PDT by Happy Rain (With one horribly sick and wrong ruling, Traitor Roberts gave us a Soviet IRS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

11 posted on 07/07/2012 4:54:36 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

So aside from Roberts, I wonder who is going to buy one of these at the news stand or grocery store checkout?


12 posted on 07/07/2012 5:09:30 PM PDT by Dogbert41 ("...The people of Jerusalem are strong, because the Lord Almighty is their God" Zech. 12:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Well he got what he wanted!


13 posted on 07/07/2012 5:18:59 PM PDT by FrdmLvr (culture, language, borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“By contrast, the Congress voting to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt for failing to deliver documents on the “Fast & Furious” program drew two dismissive paragraphs –”


Wow. They actually mentioned it? I`m shocked. No sarc/


14 posted on 07/07/2012 5:19:25 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
“Roberts had to squirm like Houdini to reach middle ground (in the second part of his ruling, he held that the mandate to buy insurance is not a tax, but by the third section he announced that it is) only enhanced the bravura of the feat.”

The example cited is not the only example of Roberts “Squirming like Houdini”. The entire decision is simply nonsense. It is totally inconsistent both with itself and what the authors of the bill had said.

Robert's decision is not a "compromise" or a "bravura feat". It is an abandonment of logic, legal principles and even common sense. Roberts originally had decided the health care law was unconstitutional. Late in the process, for no perceptible reason he changed his position and supported the law.

No one can refute that John Roberts is very intelligent. He is far too intelligent to believe “squirming like Houdini” and simply making stupid, illogical and contradictory statements constitutes a sound legal analysis.

Whatever the reason for Robert's decision, the dishonest praise by the MSM proves something is very wrong.

15 posted on 07/07/2012 5:28:22 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Good grief.

You know what REALLY worries me ... where does the Roberts Court go from here? I see him sliding much more toward Kennedy on Social issues, i.e. liberal. I also see the Court, shifting, somewhat, to the Left.

The Health Care ruling is the least of our problems.


16 posted on 07/07/2012 5:34:15 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Congratulations, Roberts. You’ve destroyed the integrity of the court in exchange for some media whoring. This is his legacy.


22 posted on 07/08/2012 4:19:11 AM PDT by ArcadeQuarters (We will have a liberal president. Let's not have a liberal congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Had the decision gone the other way, the Court would have been trashed, criticized, villified and de-legitimized; the usual tactic of the subversive left.

(It looks like Mr. Roberts might have been threatened; if true, it would be lovely to find out by whom.)

IMHO


24 posted on 07/08/2012 5:53:47 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson