During the Bail Hearing, he was questioned about his income, savings and net worth. Zimmerman failed to disclose the online fund-raising efforts that represented over $100,000. Thus, bail was set based upon his financial disclosure. This was an intentional lie, when full disclosure was an option, Zimmerman opted to tell a whopper.
In jail, he was on a monitored phone call where his wife was asking what to do with the money - they spoke in a very sophisticated "code", using dollars to represent $1,000 increments. It took a 5th grader about 30 seconds to decode this communications. That is why his bail was recinded and he got to spend the next few weeks in jail. He was released recently, with his online fundraising money taken into consideration - hence his "Million Dollar" bail (of which he has to front 10%) as insurance he will return to face trial.
Prove it. Who had control of the account at the time? What was the purpose of the account?
Or should we just not bother you with things like facts?
Can you post a link to this questioning??? and then explain why the court doesn't have a record of it???
Thus, bail was set based upon his financial disclosure.
Can you post a link to this financial disclosure and explain why the court has no record of it???
they spoke in a very sophisticated "code" .... It took a 5th grader about 30 seconds to decode this communications.
So then which was it: sophisticated??? or 5th grade level??? Is there a law against speaking in "code"????