Meant to finish sentence:
“I’m trying to understand how that will play out. Will the Obamatons likely implement a pro-rated Obamacare with no revenues from those rebelling states — and no care benefits given to those states.”
Yes, I too am trying to understand this, how it would play out.
My question is, we already have OPTING OUT, which a few states have already done (perhaps Idaho is one, see post #7), and the most recent I have heard of is Florida. So, back to my question: how is nullification different from opting out in how it would play out? Is it just a legal thing, that the states decide on the basis of the 10th Amendment that they will NULLIFY this law?
My guess is that the attorneys in the Governors’ mansions all over this country are going to be really busy, and I would love to be a fly in the wall at the next Governors’ Meeting.
Repeal and replace with something we can afford, is my hope and prayer for this country.
Obama may just declare the opted out states as secessionists.
He would rather castigate the non-Obamataxcare states through the MSM.
Thats just fine, peachy and dandy as we can counter.
We can counter with our own election, we have Tea Party candidates, we can have a popular vote.
We don’t need Obama or Romney, let them battle for control of the blue states of Obamacataxcare-land.