Yes, I too am trying to understand this, how it would play out.
My question is, we already have OPTING OUT, which a few states have already done (perhaps Idaho is one, see post #7), and the most recent I have heard of is Florida. So, back to my question: how is nullification different from opting out in how it would play out? Is it just a legal thing, that the states decide on the basis of the 10th Amendment that they will NULLIFY this law?
My guess is that the attorneys in the Governors’ mansions all over this country are going to be really busy, and I would love to be a fly in the wall at the next Governors’ Meeting.
Repeal and replace with something we can afford, is my hope and prayer for this country.
However, if opting out or nullification would take care of Obama’s inferior health care quicker than repeal and replace, I would be for whatever does the trick.
Americans do not want that INFERIOR health care. It is just about Gov’t control and not a blessing to us.
It is inferior, inferior, inferior...INFERIOR!