Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Repeal The 17th

You don’t get it.

I agree with you that there is a full line of tax abuse where they can FAVOR people for certain purchases.

What you seem to be completely oblivious to, is that Roberts has given them a 2nd full line of tax abuse to employ.

So today childless people can’t receive a tax break that people with children get. Tomorrow, not only will childless people get the tax break you don’t get, but you will also be subject to paying ADDITIONAL TAX MONEY OUT OF POCKET to the government because you lack children.

Do you get it yet????????????????????????????????????????

Yes, I agree that I am penalized if I don’t get a tax break for not owning a home. I get it already? Do you get it that ON TOP of my not getting a tax break for not owning a home, because of Roberts the government can now make me pay ADDITIONAL TAX MONEY OUT OF POCKET because I don’t own a house.

Take every single example you gave. In every example, you simply lack the benefit someone else receives.

What just got changed is, in addition to lacking the benefit others received, you can not be assessed an additional PUNISHMENT on top of it.

You don’t think that is significant?


34 posted on 07/05/2012 4:56:46 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (REPEAL OBAMACARE. Nothing else matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

So, let me see if I understand you...

You think that
a plus in the minus column
is not the same as
a minus in the plus column.

You’re right, I don’t get it.

You sound like Charlie Brown’s teacher:
“...Wa Waaa Wa Waa Wa...”


35 posted on 07/05/2012 5:05:03 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson