Posted on 07/05/2012 9:53:40 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
Your Social Security card says right on it that it cannot be used for identification.
While I appreciate the absurdity in that statement, I would argue that is what any judge will use to toss this out on its reader end.
Your Social Security card says right on it that it cannot be used for identification.
While I appreciate the absurdity in that statement, I would argue that is what any judge will use to toss this out on its rear end.
Guano.
Jean Paul Ludwig’s SSN was 045-26-8722. Nothing like Zero’s, which is 042-68-4425.
“Check out the SS website link and check for yourself.”
*******************************************************************
Obama Administration put in a change to the way SS numbers are now distributed..... They will be randomly administered....as of June 25, 2011
***************************************************************************
NOT by State & County as they had been for 40 + years.......Why?? This is another cover-up!!
Number Has Three Parts
The nine-digit SSN is composed of three parts:
The first set of three digits is called the Area Number
The second set of two digits is called the Group Number
The final set of four digits is the Serial Number
http://www.socialsecurity.gov/employer/ssnvhighgroup.htm
Attention All Users
This will be the FINAL publication of the High Group List.
The implementation of SSN Randomization on June 25, 2011 eliminates the significance of the High Group List, making it ineffective for validating SSNs issued through the new random assignment method. Please visit SSN Randomization for more information regarding this change and other effects on the SSN resulting from Randomization.
“A red herring...the SSN Obama is currently using was originally issued to a person who was born in 1890. SSNs cannot be re-issued.”
Not true. Susan Daniels is using a database of gathered personal data and not the SS Index. Born 1890 is factually inaccurate.
To whom else did it belong?
A childrens services case manager working for Catholic Social Services of Connecticut filed on behalf Obama for his SSN in 1977.
It would seem rather unusual that an adolescent living in Hawaii would be under the legal custody of Catholic Social services of Connecticut. Why Connecticut, of all places? What's the connection between the grandmother and the state of Connecticut?
I'm not deliberately playing "devil's advocate" here, but without documentation, this is nothing but speculation on your part, Brown Deer.
Where does the Constitution mention SSNs? LOL!
He can be a total fraud and still run and be elected perfectly legally. We saw it happen in 2008. If we waste our time chasing down rabbit holes, it just might happen again next November.
You are stating a set of facts which, if true, would render the controversial Social Security number used by Obama to be a legitimate number.
So it would be perfectly reasonable for you to explain how you gained knowledge of those alleged facts and to prove that they are true.
If you are incapable of proving those facts true, than we would have to consider them as speculation or theorizing.
I'm always angry when someone misrepresents the Constitution, whether that person is Obama, Roberts, World Nut Daily, or a Birther.
I'm always angry when someone misrepresents the Constitution, whether that person is Obama, Roberts, World Nut Daily, or a Birther.
That's exactly what Brown Deer is doing, stating this bogus theory as fact with no credible supporting data. None, zip, nada.
Can you make a few guesses why it might be relevant?
Beats me.
I guess I should have been more clear. I wasn’t talking about judges at all, but rather state legislatures.
Any lawful resident of the United States -- no matter where he or she is born -- can apply for and obtain a Social Security number. Thus, even a person born in Kenya would not have to steal a SSN.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.