Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has Romney Already Chosen Portman for VP?
Richard Viguerie's Conservative HQ ^ | 7/5/12 | CHQ Staff

Posted on 07/05/2012 9:33:47 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s search for a running mate is allegedly entering its final phase, and establishment Republican Ohio Senator Rob Portman is believed to be at the top of the list. Portman has campaigned repeatedly with Romney, and he is flying to New Hampshire this week — where the Romney family is vacationing — to appear at a Republican fund-raiser.

Portman continues to garner plaudits from the establishment media, but most importantly, he is the clear favorite of many establishment Republican insiders.

As The New York Times observed, “he [Portman] is among a select breed of politicians who have a keen and deep understanding of the inner workings of government.” And to the big government Republicans who were Portman’s colleagues in the George W. Bush administration and the House under Speaker Dennis Hastert, this makes him not just a safe choice, but the best choice.

Portman, who was elected to the Senate in 2010 after representing the Cincinnati area in the House for 12 years, has been around Washington for some 30 years. He may be unknown to many Republicans across the country, but in Washington -- where he worked in both Bush administrations -- he is the ultimate insider. He's also the ultimate Bush Republican.

In addition to working in both Bush administrations, Portman campaigned hard for George W. Bush in 2000, dogging Senator John McCain across Ohio, crashing McCain campaign events and contributing mightily to W’s victory in Ohio.

As the Budget Director of the George W. Bush administration, Portman became an acknowledged expert on the federal budget. Indeed, as a newly elected senator, Portman pulled out his own charts and graphs on the Senate floor to analyze the nation’s rising deficits and its then-debt of $15 trillion.

But Portman’s problem on spending is not his knowledge of the budget, it is his failure to actually do anything to end the deficits and debt that are destroying the American dream we just celebrated on the 4th of July.

Portman, like many establishment Republicans, comes across as a basically conservative Main Street Ohio politician -- but he’s no Bob Taft.

If Republicans want to defeat President Obama, and in the process get America off the road to economic disaster, they must reject the big government Republicanism that led the Republican Party to its defeats in 2006 and 2010.

Mitt Romney claims that he is a Washington outsider who was not part of those Republican disasters. If that’s true, he will certainly choose a conservative “boat rocker” like Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal or Jim DeMint, not the chief architect of George W. Bush’s budget deficit disasters.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012swingstates; 2012veep; biggovernment; establishment; oh2012; portman; romney; romney2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: Andy from Chapel Hill

Presidents approve congressional spending, mightily influence congressional spending and have the biggest bully pulpit out there communicating with the electorate, who influence congressional spending.


41 posted on 07/05/2012 10:51:12 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Chapel Hill
“Competence”

Romney will have NONE of that! He spent years and millions attacking competence. And his governorship proved his contempt for American values. He's called Barry lite for a reason and not ONLY because mitt is the grandfather of obamacare - he nurses his own little socialistic Romneycare!

42 posted on 07/05/2012 10:54:53 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: newheart

“Choosing Portman would be all about winning Ohio. And finding someone who would not out-charisma Myth. For my money they’d be better off focusing on Florida, bringing on Rubio, and letting the charisma issue go.”

Negatory on that.

Portman is the better choice because Ohio will be a “more difficult win” for Romney than Florida. Romney needs both states to win, but Florida can probably be coaxed to the Republican side without the benefit of a native son on the ticket. Ohio is more problematic, and without Ohio, Romney hasn’t a prayer to win.

Also, there is a VERY good reason why Portman is the better choice than Rubio. It’s a matter of hot contention, but Rubio’s Constitutional qualifications to be president are questionable and will be attacked by the ‘rats and by the media. And… there are many conservatives who are of the opinion that, regardless of his smooth external appearance, Rubio isn’t really very “conservative” at all, and is an amnesty suppporter in his heart.

My opinion only, yours is different. But I sense that in the future, Rubio is going to be just one more disappointment to the conservative cause.


43 posted on 07/05/2012 11:01:48 AM PDT by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

another RINO?

where is he on homosexual based marriage? if he support it then he is out.

Does he oppose the federal marriage amendment? if not then he is out.

This UN small arms anti-second amendment treaty?

Obamatax?

Portman is not even on the f-list let alone the a-list.


44 posted on 07/05/2012 11:03:52 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
If he chooses Portman I am 100% guaranteed to vote for Romney


45 posted on 07/05/2012 11:07:06 AM PDT by Mr. K (OBAMA MUST BE STOPPED ROMNEY/GINGRICH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Road Glide

he might win Ohio but at what price? it might be a pyric victory.


46 posted on 07/05/2012 11:07:20 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: newheart
Choosing Portman would be all about winning Ohio.

I can't imagine a single Ohioan who wouldn't have voted for Romney suddenly getting excited enough about Portman to pull the lever for the pair of them.

47 posted on 07/05/2012 11:10:59 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (You only have three billion heartbeats in a lifetime.How many does the government claim as its own?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reegs

48 posted on 07/05/2012 11:16:42 AM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Good point.


49 posted on 07/05/2012 11:32:06 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

Yes, truly the Stupid Party, but Mitt could do worse. I shudder to think of the RINOs he might choose!


50 posted on 07/05/2012 12:32:13 PM PDT by jch10 (Fail to the Chief!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void; SharpRightTurn; Paladin2
I thought she was a Hillary!™ fan?

Well she certainly looks excited to be standing next to Hillary.

51 posted on 07/05/2012 12:53:46 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

And vice-versa...


52 posted on 07/05/2012 12:59:12 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1261 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
Voting for Romney is hard enough to swallow let alone having Portman on the ticket.

I can see the banners now:

ROMNEYCANOE AND PORTMAN TOO!

53 posted on 07/05/2012 1:19:34 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

Is anyone surprised?


54 posted on 07/05/2012 2:16:49 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

So, all of the soldiers, sailors and airmen who thought Patton and Marshall were superior leaders over Eisenhower should have gone AWOL instead of fighting the Nazis when Eisenhower was named Supreme Allied Commander in Europe?


55 posted on 07/05/2012 2:56:48 PM PDT by Andy from Chapel Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Chapel Hill

You are talking about men who loved and served our country, I’m talking about a man with NO military background but sought out four draft deferments, and his 5 boys and none have served and neither did his father.

They TAKE from America and all she has to offer has done NOTHING FOR America. Patriotism is zippo w/the Romney’s w/their appearance of “that’s someone else’s job they do FOR THEM.” Bunch of faggots!


56 posted on 07/05/2012 3:57:27 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

If you believe that serving in the military is the only way to serve your country then you are beyond hope.

The primaries are over. The forces of conservatism could not produce a candidate that could beat Romney. Now, there is only one practical and legal way to remove Obama from office and that is to elect Romney. Period.


57 posted on 07/05/2012 5:45:48 PM PDT by Andy from Chapel Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

BORING BORING BORING


58 posted on 07/09/2012 12:58:06 PM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson