To: xzins
“Romney: the king of the 3 day later comment.”
Stop whining. This is not a game. Any reasonable person should at least take the time to read all the opinions and dissents before saying that the decision was political.
To: BarnacleCenturion
Any reasonable person should at least take the time to read all the opinions and dissents before saying that the decision was political.I have. And more: I've read all the referenced precedents, and all the legal definitions of relevant terms from the late 18th and early 19th century dictionaires.
The more I researched it, the more convinced I became that the decision was political--or worse.
22 posted on
07/04/2012 5:28:03 PM PDT by
sourcery
(If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
To: BarnacleCenturion
Are you really suggesting Romney read the opinions and dissents?
23 posted on
07/04/2012 5:30:49 PM PDT by
jimbo123
To: BarnacleCenturion
I knew it instantly.
Bottom line: A “conservative” voting for massive, intrusive government.
What else is there to know? Only Flip Mitt and his ilk would be in the dark.
26 posted on
07/04/2012 5:32:29 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
To: BarnacleCenturion
I knew it instantly.
Bottom line: A “conservative” voting for massive, intrusive government.
What else is there to know? Only Flip Mitt and his ilk would be in the dark.
30 posted on
07/04/2012 5:38:42 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
To: BarnacleCenturion; ForGod'sSake
Stop whining. This is not a game. Any reasonable person should at least take the time to read all the opinions and dissents before saying that the decision was political.When we're already seven times more "governed" than we need to be, why would you need to read the decision to know that anything that FURTHER empowers the government, especially the "federal" government, is a move in the wrong direction?? We can start talking about the need for a new power or program for them here and there once we've killed about 85% of what's there now, and not before. Now I'm not talking about commenting on motivation, just about commenting on the decision itself.
68 posted on
07/04/2012 8:52:52 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: BarnacleCenturion
“Any reasonable person should at least take the time to read all the opinions and dissents before saying that the decision was political”
And you actually think Romulus took time out of Jet Skiing to
read the 200 page ruling? Get real.
To: BarnacleCenturion; xzins
Stop whining. This is not a game. Any reasonable person should at least take the time to read all the opinions and dissents before saying that the decision was political.
Get back to us when Romney renounces his own RomneyCare along with IT'S INDIVIDUAL MANDATE.
Romney is still touting that socialist piece of CRAP as something worthwhile as being implemented at the state level.
73 posted on
07/04/2012 9:53:57 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson