[NoLibZone]

If the left won, why is he so sad?

This is the largest Rope-a-dope in the history of mankind.

[Cringing Negativism Network]

What’s up with all the Schumer quotes today?

Sheesh.

[afraidfortherepublic]

Since when is a Supreme Court Justice allowed to make “promises” on future cases? If Roberts made a “promise” on a case before it was argued in his court, then he should be impeached.

[moonshot925]

“We have three branches of government, we a house, we have a senate and we have a president.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fG0Jpu9geWY

[umgud]

I think Robert’s decision is wrong, but he sure put a crimp on furure Commerce Clause challenges.

[nothingnew]

“In my view it certainly merited upholding under the Commerce Clause,” said Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), his party’s leader on messaging. “I do worry, in the future, about the courts limiting the Commerce Clause as a way of limiting the ability of the federal government to help average...

That's because you're a douchbag.

FMCDH(BITS)

[Clock King]

I still want to know what Roberts was threatened with, to force him to change his mind.

[Emmett McCarthy]

A Democrat, especially a sleaze like Schumer, is going to hold someone to a “promise”? LOL

[tobyhill]

Schumer is PO’ed because he knows that Obamcare can be repealed by a simple majority or funding blocked by the House and there's nothing he can do about it. He also knows that the State's won their case and don't have to expand Medicaid.

[bruinbirdman]

"argued that the Bush-appointed jurist broke his promise by narrowing the scope of the Commerce Clause. "

And the four communist justices all agreed with Roberts.

yitbos

[tflabo]

misChief inJustice John Robs US.

[Pearls Before Swine]

Schumer expected Roberts to observe precedents set by prior decisions. In Chuckie’s view, since Willard v. Filburn, there have been NO limits to government power under the Commerce Clause. As far as he, and prior courts, were concerned, the Commerce Clause was the green light to virtually unlimited Federal control and intervention.

So, for Roberts to posit some limits, in Chuckie’s twisted view, is a break with a precedent that he really likes.

[tflabo]

Chucky is a Schmucky and a Schleppy Rat he is,
A snarky, lefty commie, he serves trouble as his biz.

[NoLibZone]

Chuckie is lying.

He can’t produce the promise.

He is interpreting Roberts past decisions to arrive at a “promise”.

[Past Your Eyes]

I cannot think of another senator who I would like to be in the presence of any less than Chuck Schumer.
(Great sentence, eh?)

[Popman]

Chuck is no dummy....he knows the Roberts opinion will make the dem jobs much harder in the future by limiting the powers of Congress to rape the average citizen....

He just concerned they will actually have to sell their pablum in the harsh light of the law.... No more phony BS legislation tricks....

[newzjunkey]

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), his party’s leader on messaging.

No surprise there. This begs the question, do Republicans have a party leader on messaging?

[kushnejz]

I apologize for Schumer. I’m from NY so there is no one to blame but me and my fellow NY voters. What a dunderhead. He is embarrassing.

[nickcarraway]

This is such a joke. Roberts did not narrow the scope of the Commerce clause one bit. Since the ruling had the opposite effect, I don’t think his CYA will be recognized by any court.

[muleskinner]

Promise? What promise?