I don’t see why driving is considered an indicator of “freedom” these days. What with punitive taxes, insurance costs, soon to be mandatory black boxes, limited licenses etc I don’t see it as being anything more than a pain for the younger set.
HOWEVER I saw something on the freeway the other day I had never seen before: a guy driving a truck without a license plate. Instead there was a plate that said “if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.” But no plate. He was meticulously staying within the speeding laws giving no reason to stop him. Other than the lack of a plate. It made me wonder. If someone were to decide to purchase some clunker for cash, refuse to insure, title, or plate it, what could the state really do? Do the cops really want the hassle particularly if the person is violating no traffic laws?
Do the cops really want the hassle particularly if the person is violating no traffic laws?
_________________________
No registration or plate is violating traffic laws.
They would come down on him hard because it would be an example to the herd.
In Dallas you wouldn’t make it 5 miles before that truck was hauled away by a tow truck. Having no plates is violating traffic laws.