[Meet the New Boss]

“The bill as passed by the House had no tax. End of discussion. Cite the case law the proves otherwise.”

End of discussion? What a joke.

The House bill dealt directly with amending the Internal Revenue Code. There was even a section “raising revenue” by increasing certain fees under the code.

Look if you are going to be so categorical and insistent about something how about at least do your homework.

[sourcery]

You should definitely do your homework: H. R. 3590 as passed by the House was not a revenue-raising bill. It authorized new tax credits (which don't raise any revenue), waived the recapture of tax credits (which also raises no revenue,) and authorized new income exclusions (which also don't raise revenue.)

The intent and purpose of H. R. 3590 was not to raise revenue, it was to decrease taxes and provide payola in exchange for votes.