Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Meet the New Boss
You should definitely do your homework: H. R. 3590 as passed by the House was not a revenue-raising bill. It authorized new tax credits (which don't raise any revenue), waived the recapture of tax credits (which also raises no revenue,) and authorized new income exclusions (which also don't raise revenue.)

The intent and purpose of H. R. 3590 was not to raise revenue, it was to decrease taxes and provide payola in exchange for votes.

102 posted on 06/30/2012 3:01:43 PM PDT by sourcery (If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery

“SEC. 5. INCREASE IN PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO FILE A PARTNERSHIP OR S CORPORATION RETURN.

(a) In General- Sections 6698(b)(1) and 6699(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are each amended by striking `$89’ and inserting `$110’.”

The above part of HR 3590 raises revenue. It is sufficient to make the bill a revenue-raising bill for the purposes of Senate procedures.

You may not like the way they did it and I may not like the way they did it, but the Rats knew what they were doing.


104 posted on 06/30/2012 3:05:55 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson