Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sourcery

“SEC. 5. INCREASE IN PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO FILE A PARTNERSHIP OR S CORPORATION RETURN.

(a) In General- Sections 6698(b)(1) and 6699(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are each amended by striking `$89’ and inserting `$110’.”

The above part of HR 3590 raises revenue. It is sufficient to make the bill a revenue-raising bill for the purposes of Senate procedures.

You may not like the way they did it and I may not like the way they did it, but the Rats knew what they were doing.


104 posted on 06/30/2012 3:05:55 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Meet the New Boss

A penalty has nothing to do with ‘raising revenue’ as that term was intended by the Constitutional Convention. Fines and penalties are intended as punishments, not as revenue-raising measures. Were that not so, any law that imposes a fine (as most criminal laws do, for example,) would have to originate in the House.


115 posted on 06/30/2012 4:53:54 PM PDT by sourcery (If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson