Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo
I think it was a flip caused by blackmail, “The Chicago Way.”

Most likely some old videotapes from the 1990s, when Roberts was doing pro-bono work for homosexual groups.

Smoke, fire, blackmail 20 years later.

The Chicago Way. I'll bet Axlerod wired it together, the same way he caused Obama’s previous election opponents to drop out with the timely release of sealed divorce records.

The Chicago Way.

16 posted on 06/30/2012 5:03:09 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Travis McGee

Roberts was blackmailed over the illegal adoption of his kids:

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU AUG 04, 2005 11:35:09 ET XXXXX

NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE’S CHILDREN

**Exclusive**

The DRUDGE REPORT has uncovered a plot in the NEW YORK TIMES’ newsroom to look into the adoption of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2900724/posts


21 posted on 06/30/2012 5:34:21 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee

Time to scour this dud’s history for vulnerabilities and black mail potential. I believe he is in a self-protecting societal arrangement i.e., “no standing” protection.


31 posted on 06/30/2012 6:27:50 AM PDT by mcshot (God bless the USA! OMG PLEASE vote ABO or OWW and our Country dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee

I believe that Roberts was signaling to us all along that he was compromised on the issue of Obama’s eligibility. (Ex parte invitation announced to the world on the same day as the Donofrio conference, the botched oath of office and refusal to have any videotape of any lawful oath given, and support for Kagan and Sotomayor’s failure to recuse on cases where their very positions were at issue). I believe these were red flags to say that even though he had to do what he did, he was doing them under duress and made those ethics breaches to highlight that something was wrong.

Soros has allowed Roberts to make some decisions that went against Soros’ ultimate agenda (such as the Citizens United decision) - just like Soros has allowed Fox to continue to have some actual conservative programming, and for the same reason: to make it appear that everything was fine so people would trust the system and then when the CRITICAL point arrived, Soros would insert the poison that would kill us. The initial threats were about eligibility, but as Glenn Beck found out (which ultimately led to him leaving Fox), once Soros knew he could use threats, it was just a matter of time before the threats extended to other issues. For Beck, the threats extended to anything Beck did to expose Soros’ connections to communism and Islamism. And I also have experienced direct interference from what I believe to be DHS when I tried to alert law enforcement to the possibility of Soros’ economic terrorism holding our entire system hostage.

I believe the threat that was made was another run on the bank by Soros’ communist-Islamist alliance. Which I believe was the same threat that got GW Bush, Dick Cheney, Judge David Carter, John Boehner, Roger Ailes, and possibly Condi Rice and Colin Powell to “overlook” Obama’s ineligibility.

Jeff Toobin tweeted (http://www.businessinsider.com/toobin-chief-justice-roberts-was-red-eyed-and-unhappy-when-he-read-the-obamacare-ruling-2012-6 ) that Roberts’ eyes were red and he was visibly unhappy while reading his decision. Sounds sort of like John Boehner, who would have been at the Sept 2008 meeting for the leadership the day after John McCain suspended his campaign and wanted to cancel all the debates, and GW Bush suddenly decided he had to give a speech to the country saying that Armageddon was upon us if we didn’t pass TARP. TARP wasn’t passed for some time and there was no Armageddon; that’s because the Armageddon Bush was afraid of was Soros deliberately making another run, having just demonstrated that he had the power to destroy the US economy/capitalism. This also explains why Congress would never tell us who made the run on the bank. Sources here at FR remember reading an article showing that the run originated in Indonesia, but the article was scrubbed within hours.

Anyway, there’s lots that could be said. I’ve explained a little more at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2901021/posts?page=152#152 and a little at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2900336/posts?page=519#519 .

The decision on whether to let Obamacare stand was a strategic one on the part of Soros. It would be better for Obama’s re-election chances if the nation was not galvanized and energized against Obamacare. If Obamacare was overturned perhaps conservatives would go back to sleep and Obama could get re-elected. This is why I wasn’t sure whether Soros was going to threaten Roberts into upholding Obamacare or not. It looks like Soros decided at the last minute that he didn’t fear the awakening of the sleeping giant.

I think Roberts was told to uphold Obamacare; I think he stabbed Soros in the back by doing it through calling it a tax, rather than upholding the Commerce Clause argument. That at least preserved political ammunition to try to undo the damage on this one, and perhaps the hope was that the precedent of allowing ANYTHING to be taxed could be overturned once Soros’ hold on America’s financial jugular was eliminated.

Roberts also allowed the world to see the red flags that THIS decision was under duress - with the red eyes and clearly unhappy demeanor. We know he is able to act a part, because he acted the role on Inauguration Day, even though making sure the oath was never lawfully given. But in this case he refused to even act the part, and Jeff Toobin was at least honest enough to point out Roberts’ unhappiness.

The photos of Roberts smiling, when somebody is talking about this decision, is deceptive. He was NOT smiling. I hadn’t realized that there aren’t photos allowed when the decision is being read, and I thought that the photos were of Roberts when the decision was being given. Those photos are going to hurt us because they imply a lie. The world needs to know the truth, that Roberts HATED the decision he had to read - so the world will ask, “Then why did he have to read that decision? Who made him give a decision he hated?”

The dissent still referring to Ginsburg’s opinion as the dissent could have been the conservative justices’ (and Kennedy’s) red flags to point out that all was not right. Altogether, Roberts, Kennedy, and the 3 conservative justices have created a clear picture of some foul intervention leading to the miscarriage of justice that NONE of them likes. This should have been a 5-4 decision against Obamacare, and the 5 justices who opposed it have all pitched in to the public’s realization of that.


36 posted on 06/30/2012 7:02:57 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee

It’s easy to think the worst of zer0bama and the Chicago Way. But what is even more disgusting is when we think the worst of Justice Roberts: He’s a wimp who didn’t like the negative attention at the last State of the Union, who folds like a lawn chair at the slightest hint of a political controversy. He sold out the republic for air conditioning and comfortable chairs.


44 posted on 06/30/2012 8:10:59 AM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee

President Mountain Dew told Judge John Roberts “it’d be a shame for you to end up like Judge Roll”.

F&F probably connected. Weird timing.


53 posted on 06/30/2012 10:31:33 AM PDT by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee

I thought the same thing after Roberts sided with the Left on both the Arizona ruling and Obamacare. I thought someone has blackmailed him. He seemed too much of an originalist to switch sides so radically without outside pressure.


62 posted on 07/01/2012 3:26:06 PM PDT by tell me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson