What did they have on him?
I believe they may have been holding the US economy hostage, with Soros threatening another communist-Islamist run on the bank like the one in Sept of 2008, right when Palin’s entry into the race had put McCain in the lead in the polls.
Roberts has given clues all along, since early December 2008, that he is compromised.
His ex-parte invitation to Obama to visit SCOTUS - announced to the world the same day as SCOTUS decided whether to hear Donofrio’s eligibility lawsuit.
His botching the oath of office and then giving it later where there was no proof that it was legally done (no videotape).
And his recent (December 2011) summary of 2011 in which he said that the SCOTUS justices could be trusted to know when to properly recuse themselves - even though 2 had refused to recuse themselves after specifically being asked to because the case involved their VERY POSITIONS ON SCOTUS, and a pending case (Obamacare) involved Kagan who Roberts probably knew was not going to recuse herself even though she had been in charge of formulating the government’s arguments FOR Obamacare. So Roberts was affirming the ethics of justices who exhibited the most BLATANT ETHICS VIOLATIONS possible - hearing a case where their own jobs were at issue, and hearing a case they had previously been a party to.
For those reasons I had suspected for some time that Roberts was compromised, and I feared that he would rule this way after having been threatened by Soros. I just posted a comment in this thread, giving some of the reasons why I think this is the threat that has been held over the heads of a LOT of otherwise decent, America-loving people who are now totally screwing everything up.