Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/29/2012 7:23:52 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin
Stop the spin, we lost, we got our butts kicked by people and a system we trusted. Get over it... Or do something about it, but don't you DARE tell me this was good for me..hoping I'll go away quietly. I'm reaching for my Tea Party flag and get ready to hear from me. Don't try to smooth me, just shut up and get out of my way. As Rush said yesterday, the hotter tea gets, and the longer it boils, the stronger it gets. Mark me as boiling!
2 posted on 06/29/2012 7:35:30 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag (Anybody but Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The so called silver lining” is what separates the republicans from conservatives.

Good News for republicans politically

Bad news for conservatism and America

That’s how I see this


3 posted on 06/29/2012 7:36:36 AM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“...despite overwhelming evidence that current immigrants — including Latinos — are assimilating at rates that are as high or higher than previous immigrants from Europe.”

####

1) Define “assimilating”.

2) Post your SPECIFIC “evidence”.


4 posted on 06/29/2012 7:41:54 AM PDT by EyeGuy (Armed, judgmental, fiscally responsible heterosexual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; All
GOOD STUFF! 8-)
...unlike the cr@p from the
liberals' (moronic) musings from
the (USA_SC) "Black Robes" this week.

5 posted on 06/29/2012 7:44:20 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (WA DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me Old $hit; different flie$". :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

There is a silver lining to the court decision if (a) the voters of the US wake up and move in the direction of freedom and (b) elected officials actually move in the direction of freedom.

Roberts put a major roadblock in the way of the Left by preventing the use of the commerce clause as a basis for further encroachment.

He also exposed ObamaCare to future action by the people and congress.

But will we take action? That is the question.


6 posted on 06/29/2012 7:48:57 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
There is no FREAKIN silver lining!!! ROBERTS screwed us and guarantee OsAMA four more years!! WE GOT F**k**...I HATE ROBERTS!! GO to hell you bastard!! AND yes I'm still pissed!! As the DNC chair said," IT'S constitutional, BITCHES!"
7 posted on 06/29/2012 7:49:26 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

A turd sandwich by any other name, is still a turd sandwich, enjoy the chit.


9 posted on 06/29/2012 7:53:39 AM PDT by Sea Parrot (Don't ever think that the reason I am peaceful is because I forgot how to be violent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Roberts opinion is the Wickard of our generation.

You will recall that Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942) “vividly re-imagined” the Commerce Clause so that it covered a farmer growing a crop for his private use on his own land. In this case the fact that he was growing grain to feed to his own livestock and because he was not going to put that grain on the market, he was somehow possibly going to have an effect on interestate commerce and that gave the federal government the nexus for regulating the crop.

Wickard plagues us today. Most recently in Gonzales v. Raich (2005), where a the Court ruled that a person, growing marijuana on her own property with her own soil somehow was engaged in interestate commerce.

In Raich, the court said, “Congress can regulate purely intrastate activity that is not itself ‘commercial,’ in that it is not produced for sale, if it concludes that failure to regulate that class of activity would undercut the regulation of the interstate market in that commodity.”

Now we have an expansion of this treasonous logic, for if government can wrap anything in an activity that can be taxed, then it too is legitimate, no matter how extreme.

I would point out that taxes must only be levied for legitimate government functions, and those come from the enumerated powers. In this ruling, the Court stated that ObamaCare could not be justified under the ever-elastic Commerce Clause. In doing so, they admitted it was not found in the enumerated powers. But since it was suddenly a tax, the tax could be levied and the law could stand.

So, in my opinion, this ruling is treasonous because it devises an end run around the Ninth and Tenth Amendments. Every Justice who approves of that reasoning must be impeached. (but of course, nothing will happen)

We now need to call a Convention to redefine the relationship of the self-funding, self-legalizing Leviathan State with its citizens. We must throw this Beast back in the chains from which it has now escaped lest we end up being swallowed by it.


12 posted on 06/29/2012 8:10:39 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

There is only a “silver lining” if at this point, the Republicans choose to do the right thing and get out there to WIN in November. Not only the White House, but the US Senate as well, and as many state and local races as can be done out there.

If ever there were a fetch upside the head, wake-up call, it was made known yesterday. I was surprised by the unusual interpretation of the meaning of the “Obamacare” law, now declared a “tax”, despite the denials concerning that same designation back during the time it was being rammed through the House and Senate.

Now, the ball is back in the conservative Republicans’ court. There will be no help from nominal “blue dog” Democrats, as party discipline is stronger than good common sense. And there is for sure very little help to be expected from the establishment Republican elite, who have spurned the various overtures from the T.E.A. party again and again.

What we face, is not merely a rival for power (which is how the establishment Republican elite sees this) but a completely antithetical and contrary point of view. Theoretically, in the syllogism, there is the thesis, the antithesis, and after compromise, the synthesis. Only, the third step never occurs. The antithesis demands total surrender without compromise, so thesis is never actually tested.

This has been what we have getting from the “progressives” for the past hundred years so, going back to at least the time of Teddy Roosevelt, and perhaps longer than that. It is time and past time to end this belief that the change only can ratchet one direction.

Just because there was a “change”, does not mean the change was good or beneficial in any lasting way.


13 posted on 06/29/2012 8:30:58 AM PDT by alloysteel (Fear and intimidation work. At least on the short term.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

You want to know what the silver lining is?

We are slaves.

WOOHOO ENJOY YEAH LET’S THROW A ****ING BLOCK PARTY!


14 posted on 06/29/2012 8:35:46 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson