Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CatherineofAragon
I heard it said in various speculative circles that Roberts thought he was being 'cute' by switching his vote, smacking down overuse of the commerce clause, tossing an unexploded grenade in the laps of the Democrats, and hurting Obama in November.

If ANY of this is true, how dare he. How dare he abdicate his responsibility and try to play politics.

The ramifications of this decision fundamentally changes America, and actually makes us less free than the former Soviet Union. At no point in their history did they force a purchase of anything.

55 posted on 06/29/2012 8:50:59 AM PDT by Lazamataz (People who resort to Godwin's Law are just like Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz

I had Fox on this morning and they were tossing around the various explanations/justifications for why he did what he did. You’re 100% right, Laz...none of it matters because his responsibility was to uphold the Constitution and he DITCHED THAT.


56 posted on 06/29/2012 9:33:42 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
Wasn't the whole purpose of lifetime appointments to the Supreme Court to wall the justices off from political pressure?

I've always thought the concept was a utopian fiction and Roberts' odious decision proves it.

63 posted on 07/02/2012 5:03:04 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson