Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE ROBERTS DOCTRINE
boblonsberry.com ^ | 06/29/12 | Bob Lonsberry

Posted on 06/29/2012 5:52:59 AM PDT by shortstop

There’s a reason no one expected this decision.

It’s because it makes no sense.

It’s not a rational view, it’s not consistent with any of the pleadings, it violates about 200 years of Supreme Court procedure.

And it sets the Constitution on its ear.

In a decision penned by the chief justice of the United States, the court has not only legislated, it has levied a tax. In support of an imperial presidency, it has become sovereign itself.

Precedent is abandoned, rule of law is ignored, jurisprudence is bastardized.

Obama wins and liberty loses.

The government is more powerful, the people are less free, and the Constitution is usurped.

Because the Supreme Court very oddly took an unexpected left turn. And to justify it, the chief justice produced a theory of law which had been raised by neither side, which strains credibility, and which unleashes a previously unimagined federal power.

The power to command a purchase, and to impose a punitive tax on those who fail to obey. Such penalties have previously been seen as fines, not taxes, but the chief justice declared them taxes and, with his liberal friends, imposed the biggest one in the history of the world.

Which plays fast and loose with Article 1 Section 7, which says all revenue bills must arise in the House of Representatives.

The people can only be taxed by the initiative of the most democratic portion of government.

Unless John Roberts decides to suspend the rules. In which case he and his liberal friends can do whatever the hell they want to.

Including redefine the concept of judicial review as understood since the days of Marbury v. Madison. In that landmark case from 210 years ago, the power of the federal courts to review the constitutionality of acts of Congress was established.

But after yesterday, that’s passé.

Gone are the days of judicial review, come now are the days of judicial rewrite. Instead of declaring a piece of legislation defective, the Supreme Court now takes to itself the power to correct it.

Why leave that matter to the people’s elected representatives when you have an all-knowing court to attend to it?

The chief justice declared that the individual mandate under the Commerce Clause was not constitutional. But, a tax imposed upon the same lines would be acceptable under the It’s None Of Your Damn Business Clause. So the Supreme Court rewrote the Obamacare law to delete the individual mandate and replace it with a corresponding tax.

Judicial review stops when you declare the individual mandate defective. Judicial rewrite begins when you replace it with something you like better.

Forget all that stuff you learned in elementary school about how a bill becomes a law. Under the Roberts Doctrine, the law is whatever five judgetards say it is. Forget the filibuster and the presidential signature, the chief justice has got it covered.

It’s like a plate umpire in baseball, calling balls and strikes. Only one day the pitcher throws the ball, you swing at it and miss, and a strike is called, and something very unusual happens.

The umpire steps out from behind the plate, stands behind you, moves your feet, fixes your crouch, adjusts your grip, tells you how to swing, and then orders the last pitch to be played over while he, holding your hands, swings and hits.

And scores it a homerun.

That’s what the Roberts Five did yesterday.

They cheated. And they did it to enlarge the power of the central government, to increase the tax burden of the American people, and diminish the freedom of the average citizen. You will pay more, choose less and have lower-quality health care. It’s the trifecta of oppression.

Obamacare is a monstrosity, a direct attack on the fundamental American notion of limited government. But its twin evil is a Supreme Court gone rogue, pulling legal arguments out of thin air to justify its capricious acts.

Yesterday was dangerous not so much for what it did, but for what it allows. It allows generations of future despots to claim newer and more sinister powers. History may well show that the assailant of liberty in this entire transaction was not Barack Obama, but John Roberts.

The fate of Obamacare will be determined, as it should be, by the people, at the ballot box in November. This election will be a referendum on Obamacare and the proper role of government. Those who favor Obamacare and a domineering central government will vote for Obama and the Democrats. Those who favor personal freedom and oppose Obamacare will vote for Romney and the Republicans.

Ultimately, the constitutional accountability of the ballot will determine the future of Obamacare.

But John Roberts and his confederates know no such accountability. The precedent of yesterday – the concept of judicial rewrite – and the notion that tax can be used as a punishment for those who fail to buy a government-mandated product, those judicial misdeeds will cast long shadows.

It was a decision no one saw coming.

Because it is illogical, unprecedented and un-American.

But it is the law of the land.

Thanks to John Roberts.

The dweeb who would be king.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: obamacare; roberts; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
Words have failed me since 10:30 yesterday morning.
1 posted on 06/29/2012 5:53:09 AM PDT by shortstop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shortstop

I read on another blog that the conservative justices wrote their opinion as the Majority. If true, Roberts must have changed his opinion at the last minute.


2 posted on 06/29/2012 5:57:50 AM PDT by sueQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

Guys... really. The tax thing was not made up by Roberts. He didn’t invent it. The government’s lawyers argued that the mandate could be seen as a tax. It was allowed to stand on that basis.

I hate this decision too. The law should have been thrown out. No doubt about it. However, we’re stuck with it. Going on a tear like this isn’t helping.

The decision yesterday did have some positives. The government went in arguing for a huge increase in federal power. They didn’t get it. Instead, the Supremes allowed them to have their fall back position. It’s not a huge reach into our lives. It’s just a huge new tax increase. Same old same old.

Now, let’s put on our big boy pants and go fight this thing on that basis. Obama is now responsible for the largest tax increase in human history. And he wants to screw up our whole heath care system by socializing it. We’ve got a huge job ahead of us. LET’S ROLL!!!!


3 posted on 06/29/2012 5:58:42 AM PDT by Shadowfax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

I think someone managed to slip some magical mushrooms into his food chain sometime in the last few weeks.

Hey, the Russians do it all the time! And its a more plausible explanation than all the others.


4 posted on 06/29/2012 5:58:42 AM PDT by ConradofMontferrat (According to mudslimze, my handle is a Hate Crime. Hope they don't like it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

Me too! Roberts expanded the power to tax and government will do what they want through taxes instead of the Commerce Clause. It would have been right to limit the Commerce Clause AND not uphold Obamacare.


5 posted on 06/29/2012 6:00:40 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sueQ
I read on another blog that the conservative justices wrote their opinion as the Majority. If true, Roberts must have changed his opinion at the last minute.

Some say it was due to drugs.

6 posted on 06/29/2012 6:03:58 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
I wonder how long the other serious justices will agree to participate in the charade the court has become.

Although I do not know what else they can do it must pain them to know they now are there only to lend legitimacy to what has become a farce.

7 posted on 06/29/2012 6:05:13 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

This was the same guy who voted to uphold the 2nd amendment on a number of cases. It boggles the mind, this decision.

I think he became ‘belt-wayed’. The parties with the liberal washington in crowd. The brain washed spouse. And the promise of peace at home(whip cracking sound).
I hate DC


8 posted on 06/29/2012 6:07:48 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shadowfax

Fair enough. Put on the big boy pants but I want revenge for all the unnecessary pain, confusion and anguish these bastards are putting the country through... someday, maybe but I have my doubts the opportunity will come.

No, I don’t have pure noble thoughts. We don’t have to turn the other cheek perpetually.


9 posted on 06/29/2012 6:10:21 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (You've been screwed by your government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shadowfax

So should we go on a “tear” or not?


10 posted on 06/29/2012 6:12:50 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

We (collectively, our entire country) put ourselves through that when we allowed people like Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi to rise to positions of power where they could pass these programs. We not only have to defeat them, we have to make sure that this never happens again.

I want to restate - I don’t like the decision that was handed down yesterday. I think it was wrong. But today’s reality is that it’s there in our face. We have to deal with it. Let’s deal with it.


11 posted on 06/29/2012 6:14:58 AM PDT by Shadowfax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
"I read on another blog that the conservative justices wrote their opinion as the Majority. If true, Roberts must have changed his opinion at the last minute."

Those are sure nice adopted kids you got there, Judge Roberts. I'd sure hate to see anything happen to them.

12 posted on 06/29/2012 6:15:19 AM PDT by shortstop (It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Shadowfax

you are in denial. Its ok - we all are in shock


13 posted on 06/29/2012 6:17:21 AM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Or possibly threats?

It was reported that Kennedy was visibly angry, as if in shock. This makes no sense to me if this decision was made weeks ago.


14 posted on 06/29/2012 6:19:05 AM PDT by sueQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

Speak for yourself. I am over the shock and anxious to get started defeating Obama. Lamenting yesterday’s decision and crying about Roberts isn’t helping anything. At least, it’s not helping anything on our side of the aisle.

In reality, the odds of us actually getting this thing repealed are not very good. We need to make a maximum effort.


15 posted on 06/29/2012 6:22:47 AM PDT by Shadowfax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Shadowfax

Did you vote for any of them? I sure as hell didn’t.

You make it sound so simple. We are almost outnumbered. I don’t control you nor you me or anyone else.

Just how to do you propose that we not only defeat them but make sure this never happens again.

My position is not grounded in futility but what reality are you planning to use to accomplish the task?


16 posted on 06/29/2012 6:25:01 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (You've been screwed by your government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sueQ
That's the result of white guilt in this country...

Black Marxism + White Guilt = Obamacare

John Roberts, you're a Dick Head...

17 posted on 06/29/2012 6:26:15 AM PDT by dps.inspect (rage against the Obama machine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
I suspect, and rightly so, you will get a visit.

You do need one.

That kind of comment has no place in intelligent discussion.

As for his ruling it a tax....

Judges routinely make the determination as to whether evidence, claims, etc., presented to their court are accurate or whether they are some sort of misrepresentation so his ruling that it is a tax is in effect a polite way of telling us and obummer that his claim that it is not a tax is a lie.

His ruling puts the congress in the driver's seat as they determine our tax burden.

So we do have the power to end, restrict or revise the obummer health law if we have the backbone.

If we do not, we deserve the results.

18 posted on 06/29/2012 6:27:45 AM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

Good article.


19 posted on 06/29/2012 6:27:57 AM PDT by free me (Roberts killed America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shadowfax

The tax thing was not made up by Roberts. He didn’t invent it. The government’s lawyers argued that the mandate could be seen as a tax. It was allowed to stand on that basis.
_____________________________________________________________

Wrong. Please read the dissents before spreading this idiocy.

Never before has the SC held that a penalty is a tax.


20 posted on 06/29/2012 6:30:39 AM PDT by free me (Roberts killed America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson