Posted on 06/28/2012 6:27:35 PM PDT by jimbo123
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU AUG 04, 2005 11:35:09 ET XXXXX
NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE'S CHILDREN
**Exclusive**
The DRUDGE REPORT has uncovered a plot in the NEW YORK TIMES' newsroom to look into the adoption of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts.
The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.
Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.
Both children were adopted from Latin America.
A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoptions are part of the paper's "standard background check."
Roberts’ young son Jack delighted millions of Americans during his father’s Supreme Court nomination announcement ceremony when he wouldn’t stop dancing while the President and his father spoke to a national television audience.
Previously the WASHINGTON POST Style section had published a story criticizing the outfits Josie’s and Jack’s mother had them wear at the announcement ceremony.
One top Washington official with knowledge of the NEW YORK TIMES’ plans declared: “Trying to pry into the lives of the Roberts’ family like this is despicable. Children’s lives should be off limits. The TIMES is putting politics over fundamental decency.”
One top Republican official when told of the situation was incredulous. “This can’t possibly be true?”
Developing...
(Excerpt) Read more at freerepublic.com ...
Blackmail. It’s the Chicago way.
I wonder if there was a problem with his childrens paperwork? I'm sure he loves his kids dearly , and definitely wouldn't want to lose them because of a technicality.
I think it had something to do with questions the country of origin of his adopted children.
The adoption may be quite legal but if the birth parents showed up claiming they wanted the children back you can find yourself in quite mess.
Is this the payment that bought Roberts vote?
Is there nothing so low that Obama will not stoop to it?
Roberts, a federalist and very much a Constitutionalists, all of a sudden became a socialist? His last few anti-liberty votes didn't make sense, but maybe now they do.
The Oboma administration is giving another tip of the hat to Satan who broke all the rules yet inherited his own kingdom. (Maybe the Oboma administration wasn't told about what happens to Satan at the end of the story.)
If this is indeed what happened to Roberts, I suggest we all pray for divine retribution. It doesn't get any more evil if the left really did threaten the loss of his children.
The man is pure evil to the core. He has no soul.
Ping FWIW
Sorry. Brain bubble. The multiple recount was for his seat in Washington. He really didn't win at all. His cronies just kept counting until the numbers "claimed" he won. He pulled an Al Gore and got away with it.
>>The adoption may be quite legal but if the birth parents showed up claiming they wanted the children back you can find yourself in quite mess.<<
Ding, ding, ding...we have a winner.
>> “Maybe the Oboma administration wasn’t told about what happens to Satan at the end of the story” <<
.
Luciferians, which constitute all of the elite of both parties, do not believe the Bible acount of who wins. They all are betting that Lucifer beats God.
This makes me want to cry.
bttt
>> “This makes me want to cry.” <<
.
There’s going to be lots of crying before the end of this story is written.
.
?????????????????
Sorry, the page you were looking for could not be found
Showing related results for: http://www.drudgereport.com/flash3jra.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.