Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Happened to John Roberts?
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | June 28, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 06/28/2012 3:38:24 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-218 next last
To: Kaslin

Anyone know what % of tax they would have to raise to pay for this historic mammoth piece of crap.


81 posted on 06/28/2012 5:14:07 PM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the StatistI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abigkahuna

I don’t think so because the bill did originate in the House, sort of.

The Senate took a bill that had passed the House and replaced it’s contents with Obamacare and then sent it back to the House.


82 posted on 06/28/2012 5:14:11 PM PDT by free me (Roberts killed America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.

After this last week, these words just seem to have a whole new meaning.

83 posted on 06/28/2012 5:18:50 PM PDT by catfish1957 (My dream for hope and change is to see the punk POTUS in prison for treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leep
Anyone know what % of tax they would have to raise to pay for this historic mammoth piece of crap.

What ever percent they desire to raise it....after all the 2800 pages that are now law, are just an outline. Countless new agencies will be formed to fill in the blanks with new regulations, you think the i.r.s. is bad, wait until this monster gets teeth, the i.r.s. will be nothing but one of the "police" agencies controlled and embedded in this "humanitarian" law

84 posted on 06/28/2012 5:21:34 PM PDT by Kakaze (I want The Republic back !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Roberts is a traitor to the Constitution, The Bill of Rights and to the USA. He just joined the other traitors sitting on the progressive wing of the Supreme Court.

The Arizona decision was the warning. Why would anyone expect a Judge, who does not defend State’s Rights, to recognize the rights of the Citizen’s of this Country as guaranteed under the Constitution?

Pray for our Country.


85 posted on 06/28/2012 5:34:09 PM PDT by BlessingsofLiberty (Remember Brian Terry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Most of the things posted on this site are nonsense. This has nothing to do with Harriet Maiers who was nominated and then withdrawn in favor of Alito.

Nobody can dispute that John Roberts is very intelligent. He has been a consistent constitutionalist in all his previous rulings. In this case the evidence strongly suggests that Roberts originally supported declaring the law unconstitutional. The decision was delayed until the last possible day. The stupid arguments in the majority opinion could not possibly have persuaded someone as intelligent as Roberts.

Roberts must have changed his mind late in the process. The reason for this could not have had anything to do with the legal arguments in the majority opinion. Roberts must have been pressured, blackmailed or changed his mind for some unknown reason.

86 posted on 06/28/2012 5:45:28 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nerdgirl
And you, should meet my 3 1/2 year old (my 5 year old might be a bit mature for you).

Little nerdlings. How quaint.
87 posted on 06/28/2012 5:46:51 PM PDT by mkjessup (Finley Peter Dunne- "Politics ain't beanbag")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
You should respect your elders and your betters. That would be me on this thread

Your sign up date carries no weight with me, toddle along now Pops.
88 posted on 06/28/2012 5:49:29 PM PDT by mkjessup (Finley Peter Dunne- "Politics ain't beanbag")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: nerdgirl

I completely believe that he is a Soviet mole.


89 posted on 06/28/2012 5:50:15 PM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: BlessingsofLiberty

The AZ decision ——
combined with BO’s amnesty == were just to let us know that about a million, plus all of their relatives and chain migration (20, 30 million?) are ready and willing to replace us as we age. Especially as those over 70 are worthless “units” in DeathCare terminology. Now, 40s and 50s are even too old as there are so many illegal alien “youths” willing to take our place as slaves.


90 posted on 06/28/2012 5:54:11 PM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Kakaze

So, no you do not know what percent.

Not that I am not afraid ..very afraid. The people who think they want this THING will change their minds when it is fully implemented.. but by then it will be to late.

My guess is: whatever the ball park figure is X10.


91 posted on 06/28/2012 5:59:03 PM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the StatistI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: TMA62

Agreed, it seems the man Roberts is a liberal loser who is a traitor to America and a lying dog.


92 posted on 06/28/2012 6:05:34 PM PDT by kindred (Jesus Christ is the Lord God and Messiah of Israel, a present help in time of trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: factmart

You have NO IDEA how Harriet Meirs would have ruled. She was a LOUSY nominee, a pro-abort, and a crony.

Some of us remember how horrible she was. Talk about misguided nostalgia!

Wake up. this is 2012.


93 posted on 06/28/2012 6:16:39 PM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears (Anyone who thinks we can sit home, then survive four more years of Obama, is a damned fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

You’ve seen it?


94 posted on 06/28/2012 6:18:43 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live thnrough it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
My take as a Supreme Court justice would have been: "Why the hell should I spend five seconds of my life reading a legal brief about a case involving a Federal law that the f#%&ing Speaker of the House didn't even read before sending it to the floor for a vote??"

Absolutely! Couldn't agree with you more. #1, if the lawmakers don't know what's in a pending law, that law shouldn't be passed, and #2, it should never have been foisted on SCOTUS in this manner because if you expect a judge (justice) to properly rule on a matter before the court, then they should be expected to read the moving papers.

Oh, wait ...

95 posted on 06/28/2012 6:19:15 PM PDT by Fast Moving Angel (A moral wrong is not a civil right: No religious sanction of an irreligious act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: abigkahuna

“Deciding to not appear the Court look partisan, he sided with the Liberals.”

So if I understand you correctly, John Roberts voted for Marxism to be the law of the land because he wanted to seem “fair.”

What an honorable man.

Correction, what a walking piece of anti-American crap.


96 posted on 06/28/2012 6:19:37 PM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears (Anyone who thinks we can sit home, then survive four more years of Obama, is a damned fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

>>I can’t believe all the hand wringing on this. It’s silly. it’s going to be overturned. Period. And all at once instead of piecework.
<<

You mean like GWB’s brilliant strategery to sign CFR into law with that idiotic smirk, then saying SCOTUS would overturn it?

Except they didn’t.

First of all, I don’t buy the half-baked idea, but even if it is true, we’ve had enough of morons like this playing games with our freedom instead of doing the right thing.

Such unmitigated arrogance. It’s detestable.

And liberty is not “silly.”


97 posted on 06/28/2012 6:24:41 PM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears (Anyone who thinks we can sit home, then survive four more years of Obama, is a damned fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #98 Removed by Moderator

To: Tzar

I trust Scalia’s judgement on this. He’s got a Hell of a lot more skins on the wall than that noob Roberts.


99 posted on 06/28/2012 6:33:26 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

Comment #100 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson