Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Strikes Down Stolen Valor: You Can Lie About Military Service
abcnews.go.com ^ | 6/28/12 | LEE FERRAN

Posted on 06/28/2012 9:54:34 AM PDT by ColdOne

The Supreme Court struck down the Stolen Valor Act today, saying that the First Amendment defends a person's right to lie -- even if that person is lying about awards and medals won through military service.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fuscotus; ruling; scotus; stolenvalor; stolenvaloract
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: ColdOne

Good. Now I can be a Seal who took out BinLaden like Dear Reader.


61 posted on 06/28/2012 11:45:24 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
I think I was the only Green Beret in the Navy with 4 Medals of Honor, I looked great in my uniform. Oh, and I was a General too.

HI!! I remember you, how's it going???You were one of my many junior staff members, glad you're O.K. !!!

62 posted on 06/28/2012 12:03:29 PM PDT by terycarl (lurking, but well informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

“Exactly right. You nailed it and my agreement with the assessment.”

And many of us, and Congress, DON’T agree with that assessment. If the Supreme Court struck down the law on the basis that the 1st Amendment is more important than the consequences of stealing valor, then I think it’s a bad judgment decision, and one that should be in the hands of Congress, not the Court, but a technically “legal” decision, nonetheless. If however, the Supreme Court simply ruled that it’s an unconstitutional restriction of free speech, then it’s a horrible decision unsupported by rational thought. And I’d feel that way even if I did agree with your assessment.

Of course, the media is portraying it as the Court simply ruling that it’s an unconstitutional restriction of free speech. But you’d quickly go broke if you always bet on the media’s first take about something.

Still, the more I think about it, should the Court be ruling about the relative merit of a law compared to Constitutional principles? Shouldn’t it only be ruling on whether or not a law is permissible under the Constitution?


63 posted on 06/28/2012 12:04:07 PM PDT by Stat Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Stat Man

Well, there’s no such actual thing as “stealing valor”. Stolen from whom? Those that are legitimately awarded honors for genuine acts of valor are not diminished in any way by some drunk in a bar claiming to be a SEAL with a navy cross. The drunk dishonors himself, and himself only.

Sure, the drunk should be outed and humiliated for making such claims. Rightly so. But it serves no purpose and protects no one to send him to jail for it. Better... hopefully there’s a ~real~ SEAL at the ~other~ end of the bar that can work some better sense into the guy. :-)


64 posted on 06/28/2012 12:19:45 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Stat Man

—And many of us, and Congress, DON’T agree with that assessment.—

Yes. I understand that. To quote a line from Roadhouse, “Opinions vary.”


65 posted on 06/28/2012 12:22:01 PM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Yeah, I don’t like the decision, but I have to begrudgingly agree that it’s probably the right one.


66 posted on 06/28/2012 12:48:03 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

“Those that are legitimately awarded honors for genuine acts of valor are not diminished in any way by some drunk in a bar claiming to be a SEAL with a navy cross.”

I disagree. Whenever I see someone behaving badly who represents a whole group of people, my opinion of the entire group is diminished. This for example, is why I have a very low opinion of L.A. Dodger fans. But I digress.

I think it serves the purpose of making the statement that there are some things our society won’t tolerate and this is one of them.

And you didn’t respond to my main point/question to you. How do you respond to this part of my post?:

“Because they (perjury, fraud) are defined as such in the law. And in these cases a specific type of LYING is specifically deemed illegal. But here the Court is saying you CAN’T separately define a previously unspecified type of lying as a specific unlawful type of lying, based on the First Amendment. Don’t you see that’s not logically consistent? Either all lying is protected by the Constitution, or else the government has the right to apply names (like “fraud” and “perjury” and “stolen valor”) to some types of lying, thereby making them illegal. Which is it?”


67 posted on 06/28/2012 12:55:35 PM PDT by Stat Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
In these days of the internet and computer records it should be increasingly difficult to pull off any “stolen valor”.

Most of these turkeys people were wise to as soon as they opened their yap. A lab partner in college claimed to be (like myself) a military veteran - it took all of about 10 minutes for me to figure out that he was a liar.

Nowadays one could probably get confirmation that they were full of it rather easily.

Let fools be fools. It isn't worth sacrificing the 1st Amendment over.

Now if they fill out any legal paperwork claiming to be a veteran - nail them!

But as long as they are flapping their gums making up hooey and claiming to be a Navy SEAL, just laugh at them.

They have the freedom to lie about their service (or lack of service). I have the freedom to figure out they are full of it and MOCK them.

68 posted on 06/28/2012 1:03:07 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
As the former Emperor of the World, and having received 20 purple hearts, at least one of every medal the Army, Navy, Airforce, Marines and French Foreign Legion issues, I support the right to lie.

"Pleased to meet you, Your Majesty!"

69 posted on 06/28/2012 1:04:57 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

I loved blousing those bell bottoms into my jump boots, it was really dashing looking.


70 posted on 06/28/2012 1:20:22 PM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP now goes for it's Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

That’s how I see it


71 posted on 06/28/2012 1:34:39 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

OK! I earned 4 Congressional Medals of Honor, 28 Purple Hearts and 1 FUSCOTUS.


72 posted on 06/28/2012 2:07:06 PM PDT by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

>facepalm<

You can lie about having served in the military, wear medals you have not earned, and burn our nations standard. Is nothing beyond the pale?

But God forbid you lie to a federal agent...that’s a crime.


73 posted on 06/28/2012 2:48:55 PM PDT by Molon Labbie (Prep. Now. Live Healthy, take your Shooting Iron daily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

I’m thinking of actually going to the polling place instead of absentee voting and going in black face dressed as obammy the savior.


74 posted on 06/29/2012 4:05:00 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

Appears legitimate on the surface based on this ruling from the SCOTUS. However, there would be no stolen valor based upon the person impersonating. If series, may want to consult an attorney.


75 posted on 06/29/2012 4:56:36 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Molon Labbie

Actually this ruling implies that if a person is dressed in a Military uniform lying is acceptable by the person in that uniform. Security Implications, yet perfectly acceptable. Hugh can of worms.


76 posted on 06/29/2012 5:05:13 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ..

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

77 posted on 06/29/2012 10:37:33 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stat Man

Isn’t claiming to be a police officer or a government official illegal too?


78 posted on 06/29/2012 3:55:45 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

What if someone says they’re a doctor when they’re not? What if someone says they were a Green Beret when they were just an enlisted man? What if someone says they’re an American Indian and receive benefits under that regard? We have someone running for the Senate who did just that and no one is prosecuting her. The Cherokee nation should haul her bony @ss into court on that.

We have too many laws...


79 posted on 06/30/2012 3:49:11 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Functional fraud, where the person offers a service he or she is not qualified or able to give, is not the same as a nut who never was in the service strutting around with a bunch of pretend medals and ribbons. Unless said nut actually tries to sneak into the services on that basis, or claims a prize or award on that basis. It stinks of course and for shame to the impostor.


80 posted on 06/30/2012 2:57:00 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (let me ABOs run loose, lew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson