You make a good point on de funding. I haven’t seen this opinion online, but I am thinking that what the SC said is that it could be held valid as a tax, but would need to be re-written and passed by Congress. I’m not sure I’m right, but, if this is so good luck passing a new tax in Congress in an election year.
Big sigh...........can someone PLEASE explain to this simple minded woman what on earth is going ON????
IF this ball was just batted back into the hands of CONGRESS, IS IT NOT yet still in PLAY???
Please tell me yes!!! and then CONGRESS CAN vote it down. That will still be a painful blow to Obama, and the left RIGHT??
I am thinking that what the SC said is that it could be held valid as a tax, but would need to be re-written and passed by Congress. I’m not sure I’m right, but, if this is so good luck passing a new tax in Congress in an election year.
`````````````````
Had the same opinion. Would like to see it stated clearly as “ it could be held valid as a tax, but would need to be re-written and passed by Congress”
That takes all the spin out of the ruling, and hopefully is what Roberts really agreed to.
Time will tell if our representatives have the courage to address it that way