Wait all you want. Never heard of it so I can’t tell you.
Wow, so you haven’t done very much research into the Drug Wars, eh???
Well how about this one.
Should Mark Conrad be taken seriously.
A former supervisory special agent with U.S. Customs.
He said that the CIA has agents operating inside many federal law enforcement agencies utilizing what is known as an “official cover.” He also said ICE is a perfect vehicle for the CIA because it can provide the Agency with a free pass through U.S. ports of entry.
“All an ICE agent has to do is make a call and the cargo will be cleared through the checkpoint,” he says.
He is talking about the kind of agencies you used in your letter.
So explain to me how the Sinaloas got a hold of a CIA rendition plane through a known CIA/DEA/FBI asset and used it to transport 4 tons of cocaine...
Let’s try another.
Should Leutrell Osborne be taken seriously. The man who recruited and managed CIA spies. He directed agents and assets in at least 24 countries. He was also a COMSEC officer.
Once you figure out that Osborne was a Spymaster...perhaps you will think twice about your claim that the CIA doesn’t win a turf war against law enforcement.
Osborne has said where there is a Turf War over assets - CIA wins hands down.
You claim that the CIA was arming the enemy of the Sinaloas.
You have admitted that the CIA would have had to know about F&F. F&F was arming the Sinaloas.
It couldn’t have happened without the approval of the CIA.
Btw, there is another poster here who is on the right track.
It’s called Blowback.