Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Contempt: Committee votes 23-17, finds Attorney General Holder in contempt; Update: Holder responds,
Twitchy US Politics ^ | June 20, 2012 | Mark Knoller

Posted on 06/20/2012 3:04:42 PM PDT by lbryce

Complete Title: Contempt: Commit Votes 23-17, Finds Attorney AG Holder in Contempt; Update: Holder Responds, Will Media?

House Oversight Committee votes 23-17 to cite Atty Gen Eric Holder for contempt of Congress for withholding subpoenaed documents. 20 Jun 12

Reply Retweet Favorite

Despite President Obama’s use of executive privilege this morning, the hearing before a vote on holding Attorney General Holder in contempt proceeded. And proceeded.

Minutes ago, the vote took place.

Katie Pavlich @KatiePavlich

23-17 HOLDER HELD I CONTEMPT, now moves to the House #fastandfurious 20 Jun 12

Reply Retweet Favorite

GOP Oversight

@GOPoversight

23-17: We just sent the #EricHolder #contempt resolution to the full US House of Representatives

(Excerpt) Read more at twitchy.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico
KEYWORDS: 2deadfeds; 300deadmexicans; atf; banglist; contempthearing; dea; dhs; doj; fastandfurious; fbi; gunrunner; gunwalker; holder; holdercontempt; ice; murdergate; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
Popcorn by the oil-tanker load time.
1 posted on 06/20/2012 3:04:48 PM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I’ve held the guy in contempt for years. No news here.


2 posted on 06/20/2012 3:06:59 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

With lots of butter!


3 posted on 06/20/2012 3:07:46 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Wow. That was a closer vote than I thought it would be.


4 posted on 06/20/2012 3:08:31 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

those who voted NO
should be marched to a local farmyard
and made to roll in pig and bovine doody

it’s a lot cheaper than tar and feathers these days.


5 posted on 06/20/2012 3:09:37 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

straight party line.


6 posted on 06/20/2012 3:11:04 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Isn’t Holder already on pig and bovine duty? Just askin’.


7 posted on 06/20/2012 3:12:05 PM PDT by lbryce (BHO-"Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds by way of Trinity, NM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Yep. And any Rep who votes against it next week needs to go to said farmyard, too.

Now it gets caught up in the courts till the election? Demand his resignation...even though he won't (above the law, suckahs).

8 posted on 06/20/2012 3:14:04 PM PDT by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

For those who only watch NBC, they will never know about it. They don’t even know there were hearings. The don’t even know there is something called Fast & Furious.


9 posted on 06/20/2012 3:15:00 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

If Holder is NOT formally charged with a crime and consequently found guilty while Obama is still in office.
Then he can not be pardon by Obama?


10 posted on 06/20/2012 3:15:18 PM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the StatistI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
Now it gets caught up in the courts till the election? Demand his resignation...even though he won't (above the law, suckahs).

Hey, he heads the Department of Just Us, so what would you expect[orate]?

11 posted on 06/20/2012 3:16:57 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Leep
If Holder is NOT formally charged with a crime and consequently found guilty while Obama is still in office. Then he can not be pardon by Obama?

Actually, I think you can do a preemptive "any and all crimes" pre-pardon before conviction. Whether Zero wins or loses in Nov, what disincentive would he have to do that? Impeachment? Please.

You can tell whether an (R) or a (D) is in office because when it's an (R), the politically persecuted innocents who deserve one go begging, whereas if it's a (D), every shyster and pedophile with two bucks to run together (or incriminating evidence) gets one. Bad side is, instead of a pardon, you might commit suicide by shooting yourself repeatedly.

12 posted on 06/20/2012 3:22:13 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Yea, the uninformed idiots who have heard of “Fast and Furious” think it is a movie about cars with Vin Diesel!!!
This goes to the top, Obumer should resign and do jail time.....People died, LOTS of people.


13 posted on 06/20/2012 3:23:19 PM PDT by 9422WMR (Life is not fair, just deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Rub together. Two bucks to RUB together.


14 posted on 06/20/2012 3:23:48 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

A pardon doesn’t do jack for a civil suit, does it?


15 posted on 06/20/2012 3:25:05 PM PDT by Principled (It's not enthusiasm for Romney, it's grim determination to remove Hussein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks lbryce.


16 posted on 06/20/2012 3:28:35 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
For those who only watch NBC, they will never know about it.

It was the lead story. I don't have cable and my preferred local news is the NBC affiliate.

17 posted on 06/20/2012 3:37:23 PM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Does anyone have any database software that could used to track all of Holder’s lies because I’m pretty sure it’s going to take a computer to do so.


18 posted on 06/20/2012 3:46:09 PM PDT by The Angry American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

So what does this mean? What can theoretically happen by holding Holder in contempt? I’m just curious. I definitely wanted Congress to do it, but thought this would get him fired. Does this just put a reprimand in his file or what? I.E. does this action have any teeth?


19 posted on 06/20/2012 3:47:51 PM PDT by Wisconsinlady (Remember November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wisconsinlady

“I’m just curious. I definitely wanted Congress to do it, but thought this would get him fired. Does this just put a reprimand in his file or what? I.E. does this action have any teeth?”

Please correct me if I’m wrong.

I would imagine that since Holder is head of the Justice dept that in itself makes for no way for there not to have a conflict of interest with the court system and therefore would be up to congress to deal with it through impeachment.???


20 posted on 06/20/2012 3:55:26 PM PDT by diverteach (If I find liberals in heaven after my death.....I WILL BE PISSED!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson