Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This Embarrasses You and I*: Grammar Gaffes Invade the Office in an Age of Informal[...]
WSJ ^ | June 19, 2012 | Sue Shellenbarger

Posted on 06/20/2012 6:30:54 AM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative

When Caren Berg told colleagues at a recent staff meeting, "There's new people you should meet," her boss Don Silver broke in, says Ms. Berg, a senior vice president at a Fort Lauderdale, Fla., marketing and crisis-communications company.

"I cringe every time I hear" people misuse "is" for "are," Mr. Silver says. The company's chief operations officer, Mr. Silver also hammers interns to stop peppering sentences with "like." For years, he imposed a 25-cent fine on new hires for each offense. "I am losing the battle," he says.

Managers are fighting an epidemic of grammar gaffes in the workplace. Many of them attribute slipping skills to the informality of email, texting and Twitter where slang and shortcuts are common. Such looseness with language can create bad impressions with clients, ruin marketing materials and cause communications errors, many managers say.

[...]

Mr. Garner, the usage expert, requires all job applicants at his nine-employee firm—including people who just want to pack boxes—to pass spelling and grammar tests before he will hire them. And he requires employees to have at least two other people copy-edit and make corrections to every important email and letter that goes out.

"Twenty-five years ago it was impossible to put your hands on something that hadn't been professionally copy-edited," Mr. Garner says. "Today, it is actually hard to put your hands on something that has been professionally copy-edited."

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: communication; education; literacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 last
To: discostu

There is no “evolution”. There is simply change, and that change can be good or bad. It can be change toward standard english or change toward Ebonics. We, individually an dcollectively, get to choose, and if we choose wrongly the culture and the life of the mind is degraded.


181 posted on 06/25/2012 7:40:30 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

That’s what evolution is, change,:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/evolution
1. any process of formation or growth; development: the evolution of a language; the evolution of the airplane.

Look they even used language as an example. And no you don’t get to choose, evolution happens. The most you get to choose is whether you’ll move with it or become an anachronistic. Evolve with life or fall behind the curve.


182 posted on 06/26/2012 7:09:09 AM PDT by discostu (Listen, do you smell something?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Evolution is not merely change. Please consult Mr. Darwin.

Those who control the cultural high ground do get to influence the direction of change. Non-prescriptivism, along with invented spelling and rain forest algebra, are simply the choices of the postmoderns in control of academia, the publishing industry, and the media.


183 posted on 07/02/2012 6:46:52 AM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

Nobody said it was merely change. If you have a problem with that I suggest you take it up with Miriam Webster, because they say you’re full of crap.


184 posted on 07/02/2012 8:13:49 AM PDT by discostu (Listen, do you smell something?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: discostu

You do understand that Merriam Webster is just a book with editors, and those editors are on the postmodern left? On second thought, probably not.


185 posted on 07/02/2012 12:44:34 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

BWAHAHAHAHQAHAH

Yeah it’s all some big evil conspiracy.

Whatever dude. Face facts, languages evolve, and you’re full of crap. Now do yourself the favor of letting this thread die instead of resurrecting to say something ridiculously stupid on it every handful of days.


186 posted on 07/02/2012 12:51:35 PM PDT by discostu (Listen, do you smell something?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: discostu

You don’t know much about the media, academia, and the publishing industry, do you, “dude”?

Have you looked up Merriam Webster definitions of words such as “fascist” or “homophobe” or “socialist” or “environmentalist”?

Right, I didn’t think so.

Get back to me with your analysis, if you are capable of analysis.


187 posted on 07/03/2012 8:02:27 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: discostu

You don’t know much about the media, academia, and the publishing industry, do you, “dude”?

Have you looked up Merriam Webster definitions of words such as “fascist” or “homophobe” or “socialist” or “environmentalist”?

Right, I didn’t think so.

Get back to me with your analysis, if you are capable of analysis.


188 posted on 07/03/2012 8:04:03 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

And you clearly don’t know anything about reality.

Languages evolve, this is a simple truth that has nothing to do with media, academia or publishing.

Nobody says “thee” or “thou” anymore
“Ain’t” IS a word
“Whom” is dead
“Humbug” used to be a dirty word
“Blogosphere” went from not a word to changing a presidential election in 4 years
contractions go in and out of vogue

These are all examples of our language evolving. Whether you’re smart enough to believe it or not.

There is no postmodernist conspiracy to make languages evolve, it happens, and anybody who thinks otherwise is a bleeding idiot. Bye now. No more of your moronic replies will be read, you are beneath contempt and a complete waste of time and bytes.


189 posted on 07/04/2012 7:11:12 AM PDT by discostu (Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Not only do you have a reading comprehension problem, you continue to confuse change with evolution. Some changes result from new inventions,etc., but many are deliberate and driven by an agenda. One would think that anyone posting here would recognize the intentional distortion and manipulation of language that has been a part of the left/postmodern agenda for decades. Perhaps you need to read something on the history of “political correctness”.

As for changes that result from an increasingly intellectually degenerate population, embrace it if you like. Perhaps you should consider posting in ebonics or a hillbilly dialect. It might be a better reflection of your intellect.


190 posted on 07/04/2012 8:11:53 AM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson