Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calex59

Why not just stop work 2 hours earlier on friday, same 38 hour week without disrupting the routine of the families and businesses that depend on them(child care, etc), OR cut 30 minutes from the workday from Tues through Friday.

Moonbeam Brown is a very small thinker. He wastes billions but then thinks he will save money by reducing the number of cell phones an agency uses. Not that cell phones can’t be a waste of taxpayer dollars, jus that Brown if a very small-minded thinker. He is very limited.

So in his mind, closing office buildings one day a week is green and will reduce the electricity demand one day a week, and somehow this will lead to big savings.

Of course he fails to realize that if he puts people on 10 hour working days, he has to leave those buildings powered up and lighted, with AC or heaters running an extra 2 hours a day.

Net savings will be zero, but his tiny mind can’t grasp that fact.

He really is a mental midgit. I begged friends and co-workers not to vote for him but many still did. They are flat insane to have done so, but this is California where most people are just flat insane.

They still have utopian dreams, think money grows on trees, and we can sing Kumbaya in peace. This is the state where people think if we don’t have nuclear weapons, then nobody will have cause to fear or attack us then.

I live in an insane state and Moonbeam is just the symptom. But oy what a symptom!

He can’t govern. He never has. He just wings it and of course, this cause the big problems to get bigger. He is a dreamy minded jackass that couldn’t govern this state with a gun to Linda Ronstadt’s head.


13 posted on 06/19/2012 10:50:43 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (REPEAL OBAMACARE. Nothing else matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

I dunno; bringing a building to comfortable temperature only four times a week rather than five might be a little easier on the energy bill. It would be related to the costs of bringing the temperature to the desired point, which is more intensive than keeping it there, and might not be a whole lot. But maybe something like 5%.


14 posted on 06/19/2012 10:56:28 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Let me ABOs run loose Lou!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson