[DoughtyOne]

Thanks for the additional comments.

When you come here and protest against those other laws, and put your full efforts into getting them repealed too, perhaps you’ll have a little more credibility with me.

I had to bludgeon you to admit any of them actually existed. Why would I have to do that with a guy who so readily hates all such laws.

Frankly, we both know I shouldn’t.

[JustSayNoToNannies]

I have yet to see a conservative interpretation that supports federal laws on intrastate drug matters. (It's in no way conservative to support the FDR court's Wickard v Filburn "substantial effects" test - which gave us the vast majority of today's federal welfare state.)

[...] my point is that no true conservative can voice support for unconstitutional laws.

When you come here and protest against those other laws, and put your full efforts into getting them repealed too,

I'm aware of no other issue where a significant portion of FReepers support clearly unconstitutional laws.

perhaps you’ll have a little more credibility with me.

I don't care in the slightest about my credibility with you - that's a transparent attempt to avoid addressing my points (as quoted at the beginning of this post).

I had to bludgeon you to admit any of them actually existed.

No, that was your lack of clear communication.