[muawiyah]

NOTE: the original track was that the police would be less likely to respond to calls from members of the public if they thought there was a risk of ending up like that pizza delivery lady.

That's one of the implications the cops belive is in this new law ~ I simply traced the law back to its first causes.

Another poster wanted to argue over whether the Founding Fathers knew what police powers were, only he didn't really understand the term ~ he thinks it means uniformed paramilitary city militia.

Frankly, the first incident where somebody does get hurt this thing will be right back on the grind on its way to a federal district court, and so on ~ and the examination is going to begin with the woman calling the cops.

I know there are a lot of people who want the story to start with a cop kicking in a door or getting the wrong address, but that's simply not the way THIS tale began.

Until the state legislature removes the offending judges from the bench this law will continue to be knocked down by them as Unconstitutional. I am, to say the least, distressed that we have so many Freepers who want to keep the judges on the bench to continue harming the public and distorting the Constitution.

[D-fendr]

the police would be less likely to respond to calls from members of the public if they thought there was a risk of ending up like that pizza delivery lady.

Does this law protect or encourage the murder of cops?

How?