Posted on 06/11/2012 5:25:59 AM PDT by Strategy
US President Barack Obama has ordered the US Navy and Air Force to accelerate preparations for a limited air offensive against the Assad regime and the imposition of no-fly zones over Syria, DEBKAfile reports.
Their mission will be to knock out Assad's central regime and military command centers so as to shake regime stability and restrict Syrian army and air force activity for subduing rebel action and wreaking violence on civilian populations.
(Excerpt) Read more at debka.com ...
Have the Brits/US re-built their Tomahawk supplies since Libya attacks?
B-2's are still available, and they were used over Libya.
My main point is that Syria will not be as easy as Libya from an air war aspect. The land options are: 1 - to go in through the small area of Syrian coast line and fight our way to Damascus; 2 - land in Lebanon and fight (?) our way through it to get to Syria; 3 - go in through Israel and that opens up, I cant even begin to imagine what.
I don't think there's a land option - it's a career-ending political stinker for any politician who endorses it. If our elites could be counted on to pick someone simultaneously good for Syria's non-Sunnis and our interests to succeed Assad, I'd favor intervention. However, our sorry record in Iraq (Maliki) and Afghanistan (Karzai) leads me to believe that such hopes are chimerical.
my bottom line is that intervention into Syria is a Kobyashimaru scenario that even James Tiberias Kirk could not find a winning scenairo option, even in rigging the game.
You are 100% correct. If anyone wants to argue, then they should look at Libya, which is turned into a hellhole.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.