Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

That's a shame.
1 posted on 06/11/2012 2:38:17 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Libloather

You would think some of the Dims in Congress would be rooting for Pubs to get control of everything. They are arrogant and/or ideological enough to think the Pubs will fail to turn things around and can be blamed for the final collapse.


2 posted on 06/11/2012 2:53:05 AM PDT by Kellis91789 (The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Behold! The great UNITER!! Bask in his Hope! Revel in his Change... For he has come to lower the seas, heal the earth and bring us all together as a nation.


3 posted on 06/11/2012 3:00:21 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

I was listening to WINS as I drove to Connecticut yesterday, and some wealthy individual has taken ads urging the Dems to drop Obama and nominate Hillary instead.


4 posted on 06/11/2012 3:12:48 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

We haven’t seen real in-fighting yet. When the Democrat constiuency finally realizes that paycheck they’ve been getting doesn’t have anything to back it up and they will have to [gasp] share, or be cut off, or [horror] work, there’s gonna be some mighty ticked off slackers.


5 posted on 06/11/2012 3:29:49 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Absolutely.. the dems are headed for a major breakup.. after all, look how the PUMAs derailed Obama in 2008./s

In all seriousness, the dems will still follow their dear leader because it`s what they`re directed to do. Intramural squabbles go by the wayside with `rats at election time. They live by one creed: The needs of the Party come first and foremost. Nothing else matters.


9 posted on 06/11/2012 4:29:38 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... yet voting doesn't???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

A very satisfying article, indeed.


11 posted on 06/11/2012 4:47:58 AM PDT by moovova (Michelle Obama is a community snacktivist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Obama has no one to blame but himself.

Often these leftists start to believe their own propaganda. One of their guiding stars is everybody really wants unlimited abortion, and gay marriage - the only thing holding that back are remnants of sad, uneducated rural types.

When the Obama came out for gay marriage, it was as if he shone a giant light on the Dems and said, look how radical we are. Many regular folk I know took notice, and did not like it. And as far as cracks go, I know a lot of blacks did a double take at that one.


13 posted on 06/11/2012 5:22:08 AM PDT by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

they are forgetting the biggest one, Blacks vs. Hispanics (if they continue to railroad George Zimmerman that is)


14 posted on 06/11/2012 6:43:53 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
... as did news of weekly strategy calls between Romney’s campaign and GOP leadership...

Ummm, guys, if this is true, doesn't this violate rule #11 of "The rules of the Republican Party"?

Rule #11 states:
Candidate Support
(a) The Republican National Committee shall not, without the prior written and filed approval of all members of the Republican National Committee from the state involved, contribute money or in-kind aid to any candidate for any public or party office except the nominee of the Republican Party or a candidate who is unopposed in the Republican primary after the filing deadline for that office. In those states where state law establishes a nonpartisan primary in which Republican candidates could participate, but in which the general election may not include a Republican candidate, the candidate endorsed by a convention held under the authority of the state Republican Party shall be recognized by the Republican National Committee as the Republican nominee.

(b) No state Republican Party rule or state law shall be observed that allows persons who have participated or are participating in the selection of any nominee of a party other than the Republican Party, including, but not limited to, through the use of a multiparty primary or similar type ballot, to participate in the selection of a nominee of the Republican Party for that general election. No person nominated in violation of this rule shall be recognized by the Republican National Committee as the nominee.

15 posted on 06/11/2012 9:31:50 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson