Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Einstein Avenged: Neutrinos Bow to Light Speed Laws ("E=MC2, Dammit!")
TechNewsWorld ^ | 06/08/12 | Richard Adhikari

Posted on 06/08/2012 8:33:17 PM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: samtheman

Nice try,, and i know we always get told evasions like that. But the standard constant, speed of light, is expressed as being in a vacuum.
Same thing as into nothingness, unless you also believe in dark matter.


21 posted on 06/08/2012 9:46:45 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa; Ronin
> Does going to the sun count?

Only if you're very careful to not get sun-burned. You have to sneak up on it, at night.

22 posted on 06/08/2012 9:48:46 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

Not at all! Read the story found in the fifth chapter of Daniel, Old Testament. we just haven’t learned how to get back and forth from wherever that being stood when they reached into Belshazzar’s palace party central. And don’t forget that jesus left the burial wrappings and the stone tomb without unwrapping or rolling away the stone. He appear in a locked and shuttered room and vanished right before the eyes of two whom had walked with on the road, after he broke bread with them. Star jumping won’t be any big deal once God allows us to know how He did those things He wrote down for us in the Bible.


23 posted on 06/08/2012 9:52:36 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

From one reference frame - yes.

From another reference frame - no.

Both are true at the same time, but not REALLY at the same time. It just looks that way to an observer in a third reference frame.

Real Reality 101


24 posted on 06/08/2012 9:59:08 PM PDT by muffaletaman (IMNSHO - I MIGHT be wrong, but I doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

How can they see what is faster than light. That means a clock would hace to go backwards.


25 posted on 06/08/2012 10:17:35 PM PDT by RightLady (Throw the Traitors out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: this_ol_patriot

Now that’s a great line......


26 posted on 06/08/2012 10:20:21 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

27 posted on 06/08/2012 10:33:16 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

186,000 mps

It’s not just a good idea.

It’s the law.

And it applies to all moving things inside the universe.

But it doesn’t apply to the rate of expansion of the universe itself.


28 posted on 06/08/2012 10:38:39 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard; presidio9
Did Einstein ever explain why, of all the various particles flying around the universe, photons are the fastest?

I agree with Presidio9.

Only particles with NO MASS can be propelled to the speed of light, in 'light' of Einstein's Mathematical Expression.

The less mass a particle has, the closer to the speed of light it can get.

The only question I have, is there some massless particle (or a particle with a negative mass) that can travel faster than the speed of light?

29 posted on 06/08/2012 10:44:28 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
Does this mean humans will never get star travel?

Not with any kind of reaction engine anyway. What we have now propels the craft forward by expelling reaction mass backward (equal and opposite). To exceed the speed of light you would need to expel mass at greater than the speed of light. I'm no rocket scientist, but I don't see how we can do that.

Guess we'll have to cheat in some sci-fi fashion, like harnessing wormholes or folding space...

30 posted on 06/08/2012 10:48:20 PM PDT by ZOOKER ( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. (the observable universe is 46 billion light years wide, started at a single point, and is 13.7 billion years old

If you work out the math, matter past the edge of the 'known' universe (which must constantly be accelerating, in order for the expansion to remain constant) is already way past the speed of light. We may never ever be able to 'see' the entire Universe, for that very reason.

Now, if the Universe is 'infinite', then the speed of light is constant.

Mull that over a little.

31 posted on 06/08/2012 10:50:01 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Tachyons for your tea, sir?


32 posted on 06/08/2012 10:51:52 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun
From the photon's point of view, it is created and destroyed in the same instant

Now I know why my monitor 'flickers' all the time.

33 posted on 06/08/2012 10:52:09 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun
From the photon's point of view, it is created and destroyed in the same instant, basically it doesn't exists from its’ perspective

Well... we can see photons, but then we aren't looking from 'their' point of view.

Has anyone held them up to a mirror? I know I can see myself from my point of view, if I do.

34 posted on 06/08/2012 10:55:43 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

For all we know, ‘we’ (the particles that make up our mass) may be created/destroyed in an instant, over and over.


35 posted on 06/08/2012 10:57:29 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
In other words, nothing in the universe can travel FTL but the universe itself is expanding FTL.

Or... the universe is infinite.

Can you prove it is not?

36 posted on 06/08/2012 10:59:33 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER
I'm no rocket scientist, but I don't see how we can do that.

Use particles that have a negative mass.

37 posted on 06/08/2012 11:02:39 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Tachyons for your tea, sir?

Sorry, I use chocolate milk in my tea. I get it from the center of the Milk Way Galaxy.

38 posted on 06/08/2012 11:04:53 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Tachyons for your tea, sir?

Sorry, I use chocolate milk in my tea. I get it from the center of the Milky Way Galaxy.

39 posted on 06/08/2012 11:05:06 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Which brings me to the question I’ve been itching to address: since speed is a function of distance and time, what if science discovers that Time is actually three variables, past —as in a linear function-, present -as in a planar function—, and future —as in a volumetric function? If we discover a way to create a temporal shift/disruption in the bond of ‘linear, planar, and volumetric time’ in front of a space craft (kind of on the order of a shock wave or cavitation for a submarine nose), would moving be still a function of distance and time spent covering that distance, or would distant points in space be in the present of the space craft and remain so while traversing the distance, like a photon does it?


40 posted on 06/08/2012 11:06:55 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson