Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: donna

I noticed that he was NOT charged with “domestic violence” which would have cost him his gun rights. He’s nearly as phony as Al Sharpton so I don’t care one way or the other myself.


30 posted on 06/08/2012 1:55:54 PM PDT by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Emmett McCarthy

A conviction most certainly will cost Dollar his 2A Rights.
Here is some info concerning federal law.

A “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence” means an offense that:

is a misdemeanor under Federal or State law;
has, as an element, the use or attempted use of physical force, or the threatened use of a deadly weapon; and
was committed by a current or former spouse, parent, or guardian of the victim, by a person with whom the victim shares a child in common, by a person who is cohabiting with or has cohabited with the victim as a spouse, parent, or guardian, or by a person similarly situated to a spouse, parent, or guardian of the victim.

However, a person is not considered to have been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence unless:

the person was represented by counsel in the case, or knowingly and intelligently waived the right of counsel in the case; and
in the case of a prosecution for which a person was entitled to a jury trial in the jurisdiction in which the case was tried, either —
the case was tried by a jury, or
the person knowingly and intelligently waived the right to have the case tried by a jury, by guilty plea or otherwise.

In addition, a conviction would not be disabling if it has been expunged or set aside, or is an offense for which the person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored (if the law of the jurisdiction in which the proceedings were held provides for the loss of civil rights upon conviction for such an offense) unless the pardon, expunction, or restoration of civil rights expressly provides that the person may not ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms, and the person is not otherwise prohibited by the law of the jurisdiction in which the proceedings were held from receiving or possessing firearms.

[18 U.S.C. 921(a)(33), 27 CFR 478.11]


68 posted on 06/08/2012 6:03:21 PM PDT by Brent Calvert 03969-030
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson