Posted on 06/07/2012 6:21:09 PM PDT by grundle
The political war of words over Solyndra is spawning the inevitable editing battle on Wikipedia.
Just as President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney clash on the substance of the Solyndra episode, so do the people editing Wikipedia, who toil behind the scenes correcting — and re-correcting — the site’s millions of entries.
Visitors to the “Solyndra loan controversy” page are greeted with a note: “The neutrality of this article is disputed.”
That’s an understatement.
From its creation in September, the page has sparked heated debate. Users have made more than 250 revisions, some of which other users promptly reversed.
“The entire justification for the loan was that it was supposed to create 4,000 new jobs,” a user nicknamed “Mk2z0h” wrote last year. “To remove this info from the article does not make any sense. I have put the info back into the article. Please do not remove it again.”
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
After they banned me for adding true, reliably sourced info that portrayed certain politicians in a negative light, I started creating "sockpuppet" accounts, and the above quote is from one of those.
The wikipedia article in question can be found here: “Solyndra loan controversy”
You really have to have the patience of Job to put up with the loonies at Wackypedia. I tried to correct obvious deceits several years ago and would have little trollish ones come along right behind me undoing everything I would fix - no debate no rationality - just secret sabotage.
I still use their site - especially to offer rebuts to lefties, but they are far too biased to trust.
I watched and I laughed.
Thanks, and you’re right, I did laugh!
Good work, grundle. Thanks.
I ran into it to——their thick bias and lies. It is such a Marxist Goebbel’s brainwashing site for the children.
Pink Swastika is a book I read written decade or more ago and on Wikapedia site they state the book is full of lies and “pernicious myths” and the author is a homophobe or some such lies. The author is a profound Christian who only preaches the Truth. It is all footnoted and I read some of the references and it is all true. Homosexuals have been scrubbing Nazi history since the German’s were known for their militant homosexuality—it was the international “joke” about watching your back when dealing with German politicians.
They don’t bother to point out the “lies” just state it was discredited. Now, I read it and several others which were used as references. It was all footnoted and I have ran into other references to exactly what is stated in that book. But Kevin Lively—ever since he published the book has been targeted by the radical homosexuals-—all his speeches—etc. They try to marginalize him because he has the truth about the evil homosexual movements which sprang up here in the US, but the nasty ones that sprang up in Germany-—particularly the “boyscout” group founded by a homosexual in the late 1800’s so they could have homosexual orgies in the woods with boys. Anyway—it goes into a list of all the homosexual serial killers and stats on pederasty, etc.
It is very damning -—even founding of the Nazi movement in a gay bar with militant homosexuals who became the heart of the SA-—it is actually true. Pederasts were put in charge of the Hitler Youth by Hitler himself who had homosexual chauffeurs among his closest confidantes. They brought boys to their meetings for their orgies.
Marxists can’t have the Truth because it has a special ring to it and some useful idiots might wake up from the trance the public schools and media have put them in.
The culture war is virulent when you oppose the “gay” agenda. The Pink Swastika is the most damning book for the homosexual movement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pink_Swastika
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_8JbFdH-Io
Thank you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.