Posted on 06/05/2012 5:16:26 AM PDT by SJackson
06/05/2012 04:36
Legislation would force State Department to differentiate between Palestinian refugees and descendants of refugees.
WASHINGTON Palestinian advocates are warning that a new US Senate amendment dictating a reporting requirement on the issue of Palestinian refugees could set back efforts to reach a peace deal.
The amendment to a bill, recently approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee, mandates that the secretary of state must report how many of the Palestinians serviced by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency fled or left homes in Israel during the War of Independence and how many are only their descendants.
Related: Unity gov't watered down response to PA letter
PA against Barak call for unilateral pullout
Its very dangerous. It can have a very bad reaction on the ground, said Ghaith Al- Omari, a former foreign policy advisor to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas now with the American Task Force on Palestine. It will just make any US ability to push for a responsible solution suspect in the eyes of the Palestinians and refugees in particular.
Before committee passage, the amendment was weakened slightly from the original proposal by Republican Senator Mark Kirk of Illinois which would have also mandated a count of how many of each category of Palestinians lived in the West Bank and Gaza as well as were citizens of another country after objections from the Obama administration.
This proposed amendment would be viewed around the world as the United States acting to prejudge and determine the status of this sensitive issue for decades, wrote Deputy Secretary of State Tom Nides in a letter to the Senate Appropriations Committee urging it to reject the amendment.
Final-status issues can and must only be resolved by the Israelis and Palestinians in direct negotiations, he said, arguing that the amendment would hurt efforts to build confidence and encourage talks between the two parties.
Backers of the legislation, however, say the measure would do the opposite.
One GOP Senate aide said that puncturing the UNRWA myth of millions of refugees as opposed to a much smaller number that were personally displaced between 1946 and 1948 would help resolve what has been a major stumbling block in previous rounds of negotiations.
In the end you will find a very manageable problem with practical solutions, he said. This is a dramatic stop in what has been maybe the thorniest and most difficult challenge to Middle East peace.
But the New America Foundations Leila Hilal, who has served as a legal adviser on refugees to the Palestinian negotiating team, charged that the amendment was merely an attempt to put pressure and preempt political negotiations at a time when the Israeli and American governments had both warned the Palestinians against taking unilateral steps.
Congress is engaging in a way and a place that it doesnt belong, she said.
But the Republican aide said that Congress was not only allowed but obligated to track where taxpayer money is spent, and this amendment was also an effort to provide oversight to the millions of dollars in funding the US provides UNRWA.
Jonathan Schanzer, who researches the Palestinians for the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, estimated that the number of living refugees who were displaced during the War of Independence was about 30,000 people, in contrast to the several million counted by UNRWA and cited in Nidess letter.
UNRWA provides essential services for approximately 5 million refugees, Nides wrote, detailing some of the health, education and social services the UN agency provides.
Schanzer said it was significant that Nides spelled out a number of refugees that clearly also includes descendants.
I guarantee the Palestinians will look at this letter and see it as US policy, he said.
A State Department official, however, said that this language is the standard figure used in all public conversations the US has on the issue.
Our position has always been that the descendants of refugees have always had refugee status, in keeping with the UN designation for Palestinian refugees, which recognizes the descendants as refugees, he said. Yes, these are in the second generation or third generation but are still considered refugees.
Since the UN is the arbiter on who is serviced by UNRWA and legislation passed by Congress wouldnt change that, Schanzer noted that it wouldnt have any affect on the UNs operations.
What it does is set the stage for UN reform, he said.
Presently, however, the bill hasnt even become American law, as the measure hasnt be approved by the House of Representatives let alone signed by President Barack Obama.
It remains a large question whether the legislation will be passed, as it is an amendment to an appropriations bill whose fate hinges on politics at a time of extreme gridlock in Congress and a presidential campaign.
But Schanzer said its passage by the Senate Appropriations Committee at least has a symbolic impact.
The Palestinians have had an extended position on the right of return for years. No ones questioned it, he said.
This shifts the center of gravity on the debate.Palestinians say US Senate refugee amendment may further delay peace deal
Let’s face it, the headline SHOULD read...
Palestinians will delay peace.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Peace deal, eh?
Nice article.
Sounds like two wolves and a sheep deciding what’s for dinner.
Peace deal, eh?
Mark Kirk is a RINO, but I would like to commend him for attempting this. Especially considering the very large number of Arabs live in the Chicago area.
Piece, of course, was right around the corner. But noooooo! Then they had to pass the refugee bill, so now there’ll be a war./s
Considering the so called "Leadership" in the House, this has about as much of chance of passing as does the proverbial "snow ball...." well you know the rest.
PERISH the thought that the Republi-Tards might actually do something which would put Dear Leader on the defensive?
PERISH the thought that the Republi-Tards would do something (in an election year) to expose this phony, Islamic-Jihadist-Appeaser/Defender/Supporter?
PERISH the thought that the Republi-Tards (after all these years) would take a page from the "Rat" playbook (anyone doubt that Botox San Fran Nan would not play this up big time if the situation was reversed?) and finally start fighting fire with fire?
Bunch of sniveling, Girly-Guy, Wuss, Cowards....all!!!
“Refugees” my butt.
They left Israel rubbing their hands with glee and uvulating because their muzzzie masters had told them Israel was about to be eliminated and then they would be masters of the univers. They need to move to arab states and be with their cockroach brothers.
Blah Blah Blah Blah...................
Let’s ALL just keep the pot boiling indefinitely. Iffen the Muzzies EVER wanted peace, they could have had it GENERATIONS AGO.
It will be amusing when the last actual ‘refugee’ dies and all that is left is their children and grandchildren and great grandchildren - still clamoring for the land they supposedly left behind several generations ago - that none of them have ever seen or lived on.
Legislation would force State Department to differentiate between Palestinian refugees and descendants of refugees. Palestinian advocates are warning that a new US Senate amendment dictating a reporting requirement on the issue of Palestinian refugees could set back efforts to reach a peace deal.The only thing that WON'T set back peace efforts would be the total annihilation of Islam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.