You still don't get it, do you?
Once again, the burden of proof is on the prosecution.
The prosecution will have to prove that Zimmerman attacked Martin, if their charge is to stick.
And the preponderance of evidence available thus far, such as the injuries to the respective individuals, for instance, as well as other circumstances, supports Zimmerman's claim of self-defense.
If you wish to take the prosecution's angle in this discussion, then embrace the fact that it is the state who will have to prove, with their evidence, and beyond any reasonable doubt, that something other than self-defense occurred.
Multiple freepers swear that the fact is that martin attacked zimmerman....I say support that speculation with genuine proof.
So far nobody has.....want to try to yourself?