[Sudetenland]

"Pipe bombs . . ." goes well outside of the realm of "legal."

Whether or not you agree with it, she was clearly and self-admittedly in violation of the FFA.

As someone commented on the page, she needs to be in the military where she can indulge her interests in a useful endeavor.

Oh yeah, not that hot--attractive--but not "hot." The jury is still out. :)

[ClearCase_guy]

Whether or not you agree with it, she was clearly and self-admittedly in violation of the FFA.

No question there. I imagine a court of law would see this as a bit of a slam dunk.

Now, having said that, I think it is equally obvious that the Founding Fathers would have been planting pipe bombs at British targets while thinking about the wording of the Second Amendment so that this essential right to be armed could be preserved for future generations.

Unfortunately, Big Government doesn't value the Constitution, and does value the FFA.