The entire title is: Charlie Rose and John Heilemann Wonder Why Republicans Want to Beat Obama, Conclude That It Must be Racism
1 posted on
06/01/2012 2:37:15 PM PDT by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
This notion of Obama as a socialist, that he is Chicago school, Saul Alinsky. There's all these associations that a lot of the right have with various kinds of left-wing bogeys. You know, if you look at the way the president's governed -- in my opinion, you know -- he's clearly been left of center. ROSE: Mmm-humph.
HEILEMANN: But not socialist by any means.
Socialists in America LOVED Uncle Joe Stalin too.
Communism kills, you media creeps!
Denial ain't a river.
The shackles of Socialism will not easily be applied without a revolution, but once they are in place, it may very well take a revolution (or total economic collapse) to cast them off.
Nationlizing healtcare and GM are just a few links in the chain.
Socialism is slavery to the State. Why do you think they are so bitter about people leaving the homeland? Why do you think Schmuck Schumer wants his anti-patriot act to go after those who'd rather LEAVE than pay confiscatory tax rates?
2 posted on
06/01/2012 2:48:53 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Washington could not tell a lie, Nixon could not tell the truth, Obama can't tell the difference.)
To: Kaslin
What is it about the President that seems to make them so passionate to defeat him? This happens every 4 years. Were democrats not "passionate" to defeat Bush in 2000 and 2004? These people are idiots.
3 posted on
06/01/2012 2:53:58 PM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Kaslin
The election will be cancelled, to prevent hate and racism...
...for the children.
.....sorry, for the minority children - whitey children will be rounded up.
4 posted on
06/01/2012 3:07:52 PM PDT by
lacrew
(Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
To: Kaslin
HEILEMANN: That's kind of like a PhD dissertation-style question. These guys are obviously not very bright.
5 posted on
06/01/2012 3:11:05 PM PDT by
Gamecock
To: Kaslin
The worse it gets with Obama, the greater the denial, much like when Hitler rose to power.
7 posted on
06/01/2012 3:15:42 PM PDT by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
To: Kaslin
Rose makes morons appear intelligent. I can’t stand to watch him with all the posing, tortured and protracted set up and rhetorical questions.
Isn’t Charlie a graduate of the Actor’s Studio?
8 posted on
06/01/2012 3:48:27 PM PDT by
Dick Bachert
(NOVEMBER 6th: THE END OF AN ERROR! Let us pray it's not the start of another!*)
To: Kaslin
Hey Charlie, you creep, it’s because your messiah is a Marxist /socialist, non patriot who hates America.
9 posted on
06/01/2012 3:53:27 PM PDT by
kenmcg
(How)
To: Kaslin
Charlie Rose is a liberal butt-licker, and not very bright at that.
10 posted on
06/01/2012 4:07:23 PM PDT by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: Kaslin
Uh, because he’s an arrogant yet feckless commie crook who hates America?
To: Kaslin
This says it all for me...
“...there hasn’t been one shred of entitlement reform proposed; there hasn’t been one responsible budget submitted; there hasn’t been one piece of legislation aimed at reducing debt.”
13 posted on
06/01/2012 5:56:53 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson