This elegantly circular argument between the "Birthers," and the "Constitutionalists," should keep you busy until the cows come home, Uncle Sham. It is also, IMNSVHO, the crux of Team Obama's strategy for de-fanging the issue of constitutional eligibility. Obama cannot prove he was born in Hawaii. Apparently, we can't prove he wasn't. He has admitted that his father was a foreign subject. "But without a genuine BC," you say, "how can we figure out exactly who the papa was?"
Rather than rule one way or tother, the courts, up to and including The Supreme Court have decided that the whole issue isn't worth their time. Sheriff Joe has proof of documentary chicanery ... but nowhere to take it. In the meantime Rubio and Jindal are being bruited about as VP candidates. That, IMNSVHO, means that neither party is interested in constitutional eligibility at this time.
Suffice it to say, that with 5 months to go until the election, this whole fandango just might be a classic misdirection, a waste of bandwidth, and a tremendous gift to Obama's re-election campaign. Just what is a reasonable fellow to do?
IMNSVHO, fuggedaboutit. Let's concentrate on job 1,
In re: We have yet to see a valid document
TRUE.WE have yet to see one, yet those in authority to challenge the documents have accepted them. Perhaps, just maybe, I hope, that after the Magic Marxist Mombasa Mulatto leaves office, the black-robed bumkissers of our judicial branch will bestir themselves to look at the ENTIRE citizenship issue ... after that is, they feel the threat of "urban unrest" has past. For example, IMNSVHO, the consummately stupid and pernicious custom of awarding citizenship to the offspring of those here illegally, the children of legal non-citizen residents, or the children born to visitors on a tourist visa, has absolutely no basis in law.
The argument should be between the "qualified" or "failed to qualify" part of the Twentieth Amendment, Section 3. Yes or no, did he, or didn't he? Our members of Congress need to be asked this question and provided an opportunity to show we the people why the answer is what it is. "I don't know" is an answer breaking their oath of office. "No, he didn't" is an answer that they have not only broken their oaths of office but have been complicit in committing treason against their country.
Sheriff Joe needs to question the entire Arizona congressional delegation and get their answers to the "qualified" or failed to qualify" question. Put John McCain first in line.
You wrote, “Just what is a reasonable fellow to do?”
Get a sturdy old barge, stock it with enough food and water for years, gather one’s immediate family, and embark onto the Pacific to search for some enchanted uncharted island where Western (Christian) Civilization can be nurtured and maintained until the Lord returns?
It worked for Noah... and I don’t know what else to do.
For years, praying has certainly been a bust.