The argument should be between the "qualified" or "failed to qualify" part of the Twentieth Amendment, Section 3. Yes or no, did he, or didn't he? Our members of Congress need to be asked this question and provided an opportunity to show we the people why the answer is what it is. "I don't know" is an answer breaking their oath of office. "No, he didn't" is an answer that they have not only broken their oaths of office but have been complicit in committing treason against their country.
Sheriff Joe needs to question the entire Arizona congressional delegation and get their answers to the "qualified" or failed to qualify" question. Put John McCain first in line.
There is sufficient doubt ... DOUBT ....NOT exactly PROOF ... that this strange fellow who is living in the White House may not be as advertised. That alone is enough for any state AG, or SoS to simply do his job and ask for the fellow to come up with some bona fides.
The fact that this was not done in 2006,2007, 2008, and is not done now is the cause of this problematic person in office.
Twentieth Amendment, Section 3. Yes or no, did he, or didn't he?
Uncle Sham, this simple-enough question has been put to innumerable REPUBLICAN elected officials ... by me among others ... and the answer is quite reliable.
They all reply, with a straight face, "He was born in Hawaii," as if the Constitutional Requirements somehow involve sun, sand, surfing and tiny bubbles in the wine.
In the meantime, the country is going to hell in a handbasket and the topic is off limits.