Bush had a successful 9/11 response, a good economy and at that time, a strong position on foreign policy and way.
Obama has a disastrous economy and not much else to run on. He’s completely lost the independents. Even if he is fortunate enough to motivate his base to match the enthusiasm of 2008, he cannot recapture the independents and does not have a demotivated opposition this time. This is definitely not 2004.
President Barack Obama and Gov. Mitt Romney may be dead, even in the polls.
This claptrap from the guy - Rove - who a month ago said Romney was the one in serious trouble if the election were held that day Obama would win easily. Can we do a graphic of Karl Rove’s likeness as a weathervane?
This claptrap from the guy - Rove - who a month ago said Romney was the one in serious trouble if the election were held that day Obama would win easily. Can we do a graphic of Karl Rove’s likeness as a weathervane?
Rove’s a has-been, maybe a never-was.
Whatever is going to happen, it’s not going to be predicted by Karl Rove.
Isn’t he well-off enough to retire? He really should retire.
Go fishing, Karl.
Leave us alone.
I suspect 2012 will be 1932, but in reverse.
Apples and oranges here, as we’ve never had an incumbent and obvious-to-many marxist out to destroy this nation. That said, 0’s path to winning is only by treachery. The ends justifies the means, and he certainly has a bunch of hidden committees figuring out what kind of crisis to foment, and the timing rollout, to maximize his chances. Along with the usual voter fraud and boxes of ballots to be found on election eve.
Karl Rove: Best known for taking what should have been two landslide victories and turning them into the narrowest of escapes. Seriously, George W, Bush should have won 2000 and 2004 easily but Rove’s bungling almost cost both elections.
Scores of millions will NOT vote for Bishop-backstabber
Milt Romney, the presumptuous author of RomneyCARE,
but will in its stead write in the name: Gov. Palin.