Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/31/2012 9:42:46 AM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ReformationFan

If we didn’t have abortion, we wouldn’t have this “MORAL’ problem.


2 posted on 05/31/2012 9:43:55 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

It looks as if he’s still “evolving.”


3 posted on 05/31/2012 9:45:09 AM PDT by basil (it's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

That’s because he is a misogyinst.

Sasha & Malia are lucky Zero didn’t think of this before.


4 posted on 05/31/2012 9:49:46 AM PDT by LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Obama needs a new title - Chief Priest of Molech


5 posted on 05/31/2012 9:50:38 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and pay the penalty. - Prov 22:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

What if we could figure out if the kid was going to become gay?

The moment that happens, Obama’s head might spin so fast it would develop a gravitational pull.


6 posted on 05/31/2012 9:51:49 AM PDT by VanDeKoik (If case you are wondering, I'm STILL supporting Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Satan approves this message.


7 posted on 05/31/2012 9:53:33 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Oh no, he’s an equal opportunity of murdering all babies no matter gender or color.


8 posted on 05/31/2012 9:53:53 AM PDT by Thorliveshere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Safe, legal, rare, and on-demand 24/7 for any reason whatsoever.


9 posted on 05/31/2012 9:55:54 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan
The government should not intrude in medical decisions or private family matters in this way.

Don't you just love it when the most blatantly intrusive administration in American history tries to pretend it doesn't want to intrude? These nitwits can't even come up with halfway convincing hypocrisy!

10 posted on 05/31/2012 9:56:11 AM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan
“The Administration opposes gender discrimination in all forms, but the end result of this legislation would be to subject doctors to criminal prosecution if they fail to determine the motivations behind a very personal and private decision. The government should not intrude in medical decisions or private family matters in this way.”

Simple solution: Make it illegal to disclose the gender of the baby until after the abortion or the beginning of the third tri-mester.

11 posted on 05/31/2012 9:56:50 AM PDT by Go Gordon (It's barack hussein obama - because he doesn't believe in capitalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Obama opposes banning any abortion. That is why I cannot stand him.


12 posted on 05/31/2012 9:59:41 AM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Just add ‘em to Obamah’s KILL LIST!


13 posted on 05/31/2012 10:04:52 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan
Obama opposes banning abortion based on gender

Wait 20 minutes.

15 posted on 05/31/2012 10:18:20 AM PDT by BigFinn (The King is coming and He isn't riding a donkey this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

This is nothing new. The progressives have always been eugenicists. They consider it to be the “enlightened”, “scientific” point of view. Anti-eugenicists are, to them, backwards and anti-science.


17 posted on 05/31/2012 10:40:15 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Tagline: (optional, printed after your name on post):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Obama never met an abortion he didn’t like.


19 posted on 05/31/2012 11:01:58 AM PDT by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Hey, he has no problem with partial birth, why would he have a problem with this.


20 posted on 05/31/2012 11:01:58 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Liberalism: Carrying adolescent values and behavior into adult life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Gender based abortion is wrong, but trying to pass a bill now is futile (Democrats have the Senate) and just lets Obama bang the “Republicans hate women” drum all the way to the election.


23 posted on 05/31/2012 12:05:10 PM PDT by RicocheT (Eat the rich only if you're certain it's your last meal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Well finally! We’ll now see all the feminists attacking Barry for declaring an all-out war on women. This is it!

.

.

.

Or then again...hold on, do I hear crickets?


25 posted on 05/31/2012 12:56:32 PM PDT by Darnright ("I don't trust liberals, I trust conservatives." - Lucius Annaeus Seneca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

This entire topic is senseless. For if we (I mean persons with any morals at all!) are aghast at the concept of choosing to abort a child due to gender (almost always females), then does that lessen the immorality if we accept that boys can be equally selected for extinction?

No! Abortion always kills a tiny, helpless child, a human being, one of God’s children. It matters not if the child is selcted because of gender. The reason we are so appalled is because once a certain segment is targeted, then the affected segment can now be visualized with human characteristics. For instance, now we can imagine a sweet little girl child who might be wearing a frilly pink dress at her first birthday - she is now the target of an abortionist’s suction pump or scalpel. If the child is a little boy, then we can humanize him in our mind as a cute little tyke with his first haircut, and a spoon in his hand, pounding on his highchair and a handful of blue frosting all over his sweet face!

The reason that Planned Parenthood supporters will not support laws which criminalize gender selection is that that makes the unwanted child into a person, who anyone with a heart would want to protect!


26 posted on 05/31/2012 1:25:15 PM PDT by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Anyone who claims to be “pro-choice” while opposing abortions for gender choice is so incredibly hypocritical it’s beyond belief.

The simple fact is that if the laws allow for abortion, the reason behind it simply don’t matter. I’ve long been of the belief that “pro-choice” homosexuals will be screaming bloody murder if a gene is identified that will allow a fetus to be identified as homosexual, and the mother decides to abort because she doesn’t want a homosexual child.

Wanna bet that on that day there’s a large scale conversion of homosexuals to support pro-life positions?

Mark


27 posted on 05/31/2012 2:08:04 PM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson